Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coleberd v. Coleberdgreen1 sentence2003We initially note that “ ‘[a]ll property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage, and prior to a decree of legal separation or dissolution is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or jointly.’” Coleberd v. Coleberd, 933 S.W.2d 863, 868 (Mo.App.1996) (quoting Kettler v. Kettler, 884 S.W.2d 729, 731 (Mo.App.1994)); see Clark v. Clark, 919 S.W.2d 253, 254 (Mo.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Kettler v. Kettlergreen1 sentence2003We initially note that “ ‘[a]ll property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage, and prior to a decree of legal separation or dissolution is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or jointly.’” Coleberd v. Coleberd, 933 S.W.2d 863, 868 (Mo.App.1996) (quoting Kettler v. Kettler, 884 S.W.2d 729, 731 (Mo.App.1994)); see Clark v. Clark, 919 S.W.2d 253, 254 (Mo.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2003We initially note that “ ‘[a]ll property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage, and prior to a decree of legal separation or dissolution is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or jointly.’” Coleberd v. Coleberd, 933 S.W.2d 863, 868 (Mo.App.1996) (quoting Kettler v. Kettler, 884 S.W.2d 729, 731 (Mo.App.1994)); see Clark v. Clark, 919 S.W.2d 253, 254 (Mo.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co.green1 sentence1992Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446, 448 [1] (Mo. banc 1976), citing Euge v. Lemay Bank & Trust Co., 386 S.W.2d 398, 399 (Mo.1965). | 1 | 1 |
Euge v. Lemay Bank & Trust Companygreen1 sentence1992Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446, 448 [1] (Mo. banc 1976), citing Euge v. Lemay Bank & Trust Co., 386 S.W.2d 398, 399 (Mo.1965). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bridgesgreen1 sentence1976Preliminarily we note 1) that in general, instructional error is not “plain error” unless the trial court has so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury on the law of the case as to cause manifest injustice, State v. Bridges, 491 S.W.2d 543, 547 [4] (Mo.1973); State v. Auger, 434 S.W.2d 1, 4 [1] (Mo.1968); State v. Murphy, 533 S.W .2d 716, 718[7] (Mo.App.1976), and 2) that when this case was tried in 1973 failure to instruct the jury on all the law of the case did not of itself constitute plain error. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Augergreen1 sentence1976Preliminarily we note 1) that in general, instructional error is not “plain error” unless the trial court has so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury on the law of the case as to cause manifest injustice, State v. Bridges, 491 S.W.2d 543, 547 [4] (Mo.1973); State v. Auger, 434 S.W.2d 1, 4 [1] (Mo.1968); State v. Murphy, 533 S.W .2d 716, 718[7] (Mo.App.1976), and 2) that when this case was tried in 1973 failure to instruct the jury on all the law of the case did not of itself constitute plain error. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Randolphgreen2 sentences1976Because the defendant has received two life sentences for crimes committed in the same transaction, and because failure to instruct on all defenses supported by substantial evidence may constitute plain error, State v. Randolph, 496 S.W.2d 257, 261 [4] (Mo. banc 1973), we shall, in this instance, review the record for plain error. 1976Because the defendant has received two life sentences for crimes committed in the same transaction, and because failure to instruct on all defenses supported by substantial evidence may constitute plain error, State v. Randolph, 496 S.W.2d 257, 261 [4] (Mo. banc 1973), we shall, in this instance, review the record for plain error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dexter
green
1 sentence2006Once we determine a Doyle violation has occurred, “this Court has the discretion to review the violation or violations in context of the entire record for plain error that affects substantial rights and constitutes a manifest injustice.” Dexter, 954 S.W.2d at 340 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Leisure
green
1 sentence2003Rule 30.20; Leisure, 749 S.W.2d at 376 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Jad v. Fjd
green
1 sentence1999Nonetheless, as did the Supreme Court of Missouri in J.A.D., 978 S.W.2d at 339 , this court has reviewed the record for plain error per Rule 84.13(c). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Weeks
green
1 sentence1980In his first appeal, State v. Weeks, 546 S.W.2d 567 (Mo.App.1977), we reviewed the record for plain error because defendant’s motion for new trial was not timely filed. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1977As ruled in Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 [2] (Mo.1974): “His allegations that his attorneys did not investigate all possible defenses is not sufficient to warrant relief because he does not allege what defenses were available and likely would have been discovered if further investigation had been made.” Since petitioner was not represented by counsel until this appeal was taken, on our own motion we have reviewed the record for plain error under Rule 84.13(c) and find no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.