Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Greene v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Greene , 332 S.W.3d at 241 ("A fundamental procedure requirement of Section 217.450 2 is a written demand for speedy disposition addressed to the court and prosecuting attorney where the charges are pending."). 2019Greene, 332 S.W.3d at 241 (“A fundamental procedure requirement of Section 217.450 is a written demand for speedy disposition addressed to the court and prosecuting attorney where the charges are pending.”). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Carlgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Carl, 389 S.W.3d 276 , 283 n.5 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013). 2025See State v. Carl, 389 S.W.3d 276 , 283 n.5 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Malonegreen1 sentence2019See State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 725 (Mo. banc 1985) (finding it reasonable to extend the 180-day limitation to a Monday when the 180th day falls on a Saturday). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Feldtgreen1 sentence2018See also State v. Feldt , 512 S.W.3d 135 , 151-52 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017) (In determining for statute of limitation analysis whether a later charged offense constitutes the same offense as previously charged, the courts examine whether: (1) the later charge arises from the same operative facts; (2) the later charge is derived from the same charging statute; and (3) the later charge is nothing more than an enhanced charge of the original offense- e.g. , one is a felony and the other a misdemeanor.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2022Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 . 3 The UMDDL motions did not invoke Summers’s constitutional right to speedy trial, but we note them nonetheless because a UMDDL violation, under certain circumstances, might also support a speedy trial violation under the Sixth Amendment. 2022Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 . 3 The UMDDL motions did not invoke Summers’s constitutional right to speedy trial, but we note them nonetheless because a UMDDL violation, under certain circumstances, might also support a speedy trial violation under the Sixth Amendment. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Burke v. McHenry
green
2 sentences2021James, 552 S.W.3d at 597 . 2021James, 552 S.W.3d at 597 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2010“Given the complexity of the trial and the amount of preparation and investigation required, counsel established sufficient grounds for good cause for the delay, and the additional time ensured that [defendant] received effective assistance of counsel.” Id. at 504 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |