Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bowiegreen2 sentences2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). 2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). | 1 | 3 |
Mutch v. Jarrattgreen2 sentences2005App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L. 2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). | 1 | 2 |
State v. . Stricklandgreen2 sentences1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). 1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Blackgreen2 sentences1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). 1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Huntgreen2 sentences1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). 1996"When the trial court withdraws incompetent evidence and instructs the jury not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured." State v. Black, 328 N.C. 191, 200 , 400 S.E.2d 398, 404 (1991). "`In appraising the effect of incompetent evidence once admitted and afterwards withdrawn, the Court will look to the nature of the evidence and its probable influence upon the minds of the jury in reaching a verdict.'" State v. Hunt, 287 N.C. 360, 374 , 215 S.E.2d 40, 49 (1975) (quoting State v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E.2d 469, 473 (1948)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCallgreen2 sentences1995See also State v. McCall, 286 N.C. 472, 487 , 212 S.E.2d 132, 141 (1975). 1995See also State v. McCall, 286 N.C. 472, 487 , 212 S.E.2d 132, 141 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reidgreen2 sentences1995Assuming the argument was a comment on the defendant Nathan Bowie’s failure to testify, the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction. *210 In State v. Reid, 334 N.C. 551, 556 , 434 S.E.2d 193, 197 (1993), we said a comment by the prosecutor on a defendant’s failure to testify may be cured by an instruction from the court that the comment was improper followed by an instruction not to consider the failure of the defendant not to offer himself as a witness. 1995Assuming the argument was a comment on the defendant Nathan Bowie’s failure to testify, the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction. *210 In State v. Reid, 334 N.C. 551, 556 , 434 S.E.2d 193, 197 (1993), we said a comment by the prosecutor on a defendant’s failure to testify may be cured by an instruction from the court that the comment was improper followed by an instruction not to consider the failure of the defendant not to offer himself as a witness. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Woodsgreen2 sentences1991State v. Small, 328 N.C. 175, 185-86 , 400 S.E.2d 413, 418 (1991); State v. Woods, 307 N.C. 213, 222 , 297 S.E.2d 574, 579 (1982). 1991State v. Small, 328 N.C. 175, 185-86 , 400 S.E.2d 413, 418 (1991); State v. Woods, 307 N.C. 213, 222 , 297 S.E.2d 574, 579 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smallgreen2 sentences1991State v. Small, 328 N.C. 175, 185-86 , 400 S.E.2d 413, 418 (1991); State v. Woods, 307 N.C. 213, 222 , 297 S.E.2d 574, 579 (1982). 1991State v. Small, 328 N.C. 175, 185-86 , 400 S.E.2d 413, 418 (1991); State v. Woods, 307 N.C. 213, 222 , 297 S.E.2d 574, 579 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pierce v. Freeman
neutral
1 sentence2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Fletcher
green
2 sentences2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). 2005Presuming Corriher's testimony before the jury was improper, "`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'" State v. Fletcher, 125 N.C.App. 505, 512 , 481 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1997) (quoting State v. Bowie, 340 N.C. 199, 209 , 456 S.E.2d 771, 776 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 529 , 133 L.Ed.2d 435 (1995)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Thomas
green
2 sentences2005State v. Thomas, 350 N.C. 315 , 344, 514 S.E.2d 486 , 503 (1999). 2005State v. Thomas, 350 N.C. 315 , 344, 514 S.E.2d 486 , 503 (1999). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1992State v. Smith, 301 N.C. 695 , 272 S.E.2d 852 (1981). 1992State v. Smith, 301 N.C. 695 , 272 S.E.2d 852 (1981). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.