Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2007Indeed, such error will not earn the defendant a new trial if, after examining the entire record, this Court determines that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Ward, 354 N.C. at 251 , 555 S.E.2d at 265 (internal citations omitted). 2007Indeed, such error will not earn the defendant a new trial if, after examining the entire record, this Court determines that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Ward, 354 N.C. at 251 , 555 S.E.2d at 265 (internal citations omitted). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2025State v. Thompson, 359 N.C. 77 , 122–23, 604 S.E.2d 850, 881 (2004). 2025State v. Thompson, 359 N.C. 77 , 122–23, 604 S.E.2d 850, 881 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Hoffman v. Great American Alliance Insurancegreen1 sentence2024App. at 507, 601 S.E.2d at 908. | 1 | 1 |
Charles W. Cooper v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2011When a court determines whether the doctrine applies, it should consider “[t]he particular policies of the statute of limitations in question, as well as the nature of the wrongful conduct and harm alleged.” Williams, 357 N.C. at 179 , 581 S.E.2d at 423 (quoting Cooper v. United States, 442 F.2d 908, 912 (7th Cir. 1971)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Embler v. Embler
green
1 sentence2018This Court has held when the defendant is required "to pay the distributive award from a non-liquid asset or by obtaining a loan, the equitable distribution award must be recalculated to take into account any adverse financial ramifications such as adverse tax consequences." Embler v. Embler , 159 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.
green
2 sentences2015Dogwood, 362 N.C. at 201 , 657 S.E.2d at 367 . 2015Dogwood, 362 N.C. at 201 , 657 S.E.2d at 367 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC
green
2 sentences2011When a court determines whether the doctrine applies, it should consider “[t]he particular policies of the statute of limitations in question, as well as the nature of the wrongful conduct and harm alleged.” Williams, 357 N.C. at 179 , 581 S.E.2d at 423 (quoting Cooper v. United States, 442 F.2d 908, 912 (7th Cir. 1971)). 2011When a court determines whether the doctrine applies, it should consider “[t]he particular policies of the statute of limitations in question, as well as the nature of the wrongful conduct and harm alleged.” Williams, 357 N.C. at 179 , 581 S.E.2d at 423 (quoting Cooper v. United States, 442 F.2d 908, 912 (7th Cir. 1971)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence2001Id. ; N.C.G.S. § 15A-1443(b) (1999). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.