events claim (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

events claim in North Carolina

8 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Hewes v. Johnstongreen
ncctapp · 1983 · cited in 3 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1984–1993
2 sentences

1987“To prevent a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond and prepare for trial, and (2) ‘state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim.' ” Hewes v. Hewes, 61 N.C.

1984In order to prevent dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), “a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond and prepare for trial, and (2) ‘state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim. . . .’ (Citations omitted.)” Hewes v. Johnston, 61 N.C.

23
Orange County v. Department of Transportationgreen
· 1980 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1983–1987
2 sentences

1987App. 603, 604 , 301 S.E. 2d 120, 121 (1983) (emphasis supplied) (quoting Orange County v. Dep’t of Transportation, 46 N.C.

1983To prevent a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond an'd prepare for trial, and (2) “state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim. . . .” Orange County v. Dept. of Transportation, 46 N.C.

12
Williams v. Lynchgreen
ncctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Notwithstanding the fact Plaintiff’s claim for gross negligence arises out of the same events as its claim for legal malpractice and negligence, “binding precedent requires that we look only at whether the claims in the second complaint were included in the first complaint.” Williams, 225 N.C.

2025App. at 523 , 741 S.E.2d at 374 (emphasis added).

11
Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.green
nc · 1992 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Grp., Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc., 330 N.C. 487, 501 (1992) (holding that “under the liberal concept of notice pleading[,]” a plaintiff only need “give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable defendants to respond and prepare for trial and are sufficient to satisfy the substantive elements of the claim of tortious interference with contract”) (cleaned up). 227.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hobbs green
ncctapp · 2008
2 sentences

2016We find our decision in State v. Hobbs, 190 N.C.App. 183 , 660 S.E.2d 168 (2008), to be particularly instructive on the question of whether Respondent has "satisfied his burden of attempting to reconstruct the record." Id. at 186 , 660 S.E.2d at 170 .

2016We find our decision in State v. Hobbs, 190 N.C.App. 183 , 660 S.E.2d 168 (2008), to be particularly instructive on the question of whether Respondent has "satisfied his burden of attempting to reconstruct the record." Id. at 186 , 660 S.E.2d at 170 .

12016–2016
Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill green
ncctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1992Privette v. University of North Carolina, 96 N.C.

11992–1992
Sutton v. Duke green
nc · 1970
2 sentences

1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)).

1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)).

11983–1983
Stanback v. Stanback green
nc · 1979
2 sentences

1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)).

1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)).

11983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NC 8 (1983–2025) CA 7 (1957–2023) RI 5 (2001–2017) IL 4 (1978–2018) NY 3 (1991–2004) CT 2 (1995–1996) DC 2 (1984–2018) GA 2 (2010–2021) WA 2 (1999–1999) AL 2 (1982–1986)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check