Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hewes v. Johnstongreen2 sentences1987“To prevent a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond and prepare for trial, and (2) ‘state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim.' ” Hewes v. Hewes, 61 N.C. 1984In order to prevent dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), “a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond and prepare for trial, and (2) ‘state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim. . . .’ (Citations omitted.)” Hewes v. Johnston, 61 N.C. | 2 | 3 |
Orange County v. Department of Transportationgreen2 sentences1987App. 603, 604 , 301 S.E. 2d 120, 121 (1983) (emphasis supplied) (quoting Orange County v. Dep’t of Transportation, 46 N.C. 1983To prevent a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, a party must (1) give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable the adverse party to respond an'd prepare for trial, and (2) “state enough to satisfy the substantive elements of at least some legally recognized claim. . . .” Orange County v. Dept. of Transportation, 46 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
Williams v. Lynchgreen2 sentences2025Notwithstanding the fact Plaintiff’s claim for gross negligence arises out of the same events as its claim for legal malpractice and negligence, “binding precedent requires that we look only at whether the claims in the second complaint were included in the first complaint.” Williams, 225 N.C. 2025App. at 523 , 741 S.E.2d at 374 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.green1 sentence2025Grp., Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc., 330 N.C. 487, 501 (1992) (holding that “under the liberal concept of notice pleading[,]” a plaintiff only need “give sufficient notice of the events on which the claim is based to enable defendants to respond and prepare for trial and are sufficient to satisfy the substantive elements of the claim of tortious interference with contract”) (cleaned up). 227. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hobbs
green
2 sentences2016We find our decision in State v. Hobbs, 190 N.C.App. 183 , 660 S.E.2d 168 (2008), to be particularly instructive on the question of whether Respondent has "satisfied his burden of attempting to reconstruct the record." Id. at 186 , 660 S.E.2d at 170 . 2016We find our decision in State v. Hobbs, 190 N.C.App. 183 , 660 S.E.2d 168 (2008), to be particularly instructive on the question of whether Respondent has "satisfied his burden of attempting to reconstruct the record." Id. at 186 , 660 S.E.2d at 170 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
green
1 sentence1992Privette v. University of North Carolina, 96 N.C. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Sutton v. Duke
green
2 sentences1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)). 1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Stanback v. Stanback
green
2 sentences1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)). 1983App. 350, 378-379 , 265 S.E. 2d 890, 909 (1980) (citing Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) and Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 , 254 S.E. 2d 611 (1979)). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.