Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coyle v. Battlesgreen2 sentences2018See Coyle v. Battles, 147 N.H. 98, 100 (2001) (on appeal, appellants have the burden to demonstrate error). 2015See Coyle, 147 N.H. at 100 (on appeal, appellants have the burden to demonstrate error). 2 To the extent that the defendants argue that the January 11, 2008 letter from the plaintiff’s attorney effectively terminated the contract and, thus, that no rent accrued after that date, we note that the letter expressly states: “The contract continues to accrue charges at a daily rate of forty-five dollars per day for the use of the equipment.” Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court was not compelled to find that the attorney’s letter terminated the contract. | 5 | 6 |
Hudon v. City of Manchestergreen2 sentences2001See Hudon v. City of Manchester, 141 N.H. 420, 422 (1996). 2001See Hudon v. City of Manchester, 141 N.H. 420, 422 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
Town of Nottingham v. Newmangreen1 sentence2024Coyle v. Battles, 147 N.H. 98, 100 (2001); see also Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 137 (2001) (noting that our rules of appellate practice are not relaxed for self-represented litigants). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.