8 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holmin v. TRW, INC.green1 sentence2024Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 330 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Hensley v. Eckerhartgreen2 sentences2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , 2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , | 1 | 1 |
D'Sa v. Playhut, Inc.green2 sentences2003See D'Sa v. Playhut, Inc., 85 Cal.App. 4th 927 , 102 Cal.Rptr. 2d 495, 497 (2000), review denied (Mar. 21, 2001) (holding "employer cannot lawfully make the signing of an employment agreement, which contains an unenforceable covenant not to compete, a condition of continued employment,.... [A]n employer's termination of an employee who refuses to sign such an agreement constitutes a wrongful termination in violation of public policy"). [1] IV In rendering its decision, the Law Division concluded that the reasonableness of a noncompete provision may only be determined once an employee has signe 2003See D'Sa v. Playhut, Inc., 85 Cal.App. 4th 927 , 102 Cal.Rptr. 2d 495, 497 (2000), review denied (Mar. 21, 2001) (holding "employer cannot lawfully make the signing of an employment agreement, which contains an unenforceable covenant not to compete, a condition of continued employment,.... [A]n employer's termination of an employee who refuses to sign such an agreement constitutes a wrongful termination in violation of public policy"). [1] IV In rendering its decision, the Law Division concluded that the reasonableness of a noncompete provision may only be determined once an employee has signe | 1 | 1 |
Lepore v. National Tool and Mfg. Co.green1 sentence1988See Lepore v. National Tool and Manufacturing Company, 224 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.
green
2 sentences2012Co. v. L-C-A Sales Co., 155 N.J. 29, 31 , 713 A. 2d 1007 (1998), the Court was confronted with the question whether an "employee exclusion" similar to the one set forth in subsection (d) excluded coverage for a wrongful termination claim under the Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49, in the absence of exclusions similar to those set forth in subsections (a), (b) and (c) that specifically address such claims. 2012Co. v. L-C-A Sales Co., 155 N.J. 29, 31 , 713 A. 2d 1007 (1998), the Court was confronted with the question whether an "employee exclusion" similar to the one set forth in subsection (d) excluded coverage for a wrongful termination claim under the Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49, in the absence of exclusions similar to those set forth in subsections (a), (b) and (c) that specifically address such claims. | 2 | 1999–2012 |
Singer v. State
green
2 sentences2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , 2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Ruberton v. Gabage
green
2 sentences2004Ruberton, supra, 280 N.J.Super. at 129-30 , 654 A. 2d 1002 . 2004Ruberton, supra, 280 N.J.Super. at 129-30 , 654 A. 2d 1002 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
New Jersey v. Singer
green
1 sentence2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Winslow v. Williams
green
1 sentence2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Fennell v. Warner Lambert Co.
green
1 sentence2004It was the termination which resulted in successful litigation and which caused plaintiff's counsel to change his attack to one which included a wrongful discharge claim premised on the work he did incident to the constructive termination and harassment suit. [7] When the *35 "unsuccessful claims are related to the successful claims, either by a `common core of facts' or `related legal theories,' the court must consider the significance of the overall relief obtained to determine whether those hours devoted to the unsuccessful claims should be compensated." Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 500 , | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Coskey's TV & Radio Sales v. Foti
green
2 sentences2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. 2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Solari Industries, Inc. v. Malady
green
2 sentences2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. 2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Karlin v. Weinberg
green
2 sentences2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. 2003Karlin, supra, 77 N.J. 408 , 390 A. 2d 1161 ; Solari, supra, 55 N.J. 571 , 264 A. 2d 53 ; Coskey's, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 626 , 602 A. 2d 789 ; A.T. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Picogna v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1992In Picogna v. Board of Educ., 249 N.J.Super 332, 592 A. 2d 570 (App.Div. 1991), the court found that the Commissioner of Education did not have jurisdiction to hear a wrongful termination claim since it did not arise under the school law. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.