5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Karen Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C.green2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 2 | 2 |
Tullis v. Merrillgreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 2 | 2 |
Lara v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 2 | 2 |
Nathan Berry v. Liberty Holdings, Inc. A/K/A Liberty Ready Mixgreen2 sentences2025Carver-Kimm v. Reynolds, 992 N.W.2d 591 , 598 (Iowa 2023) (quoting Berry v. Liberty Holdings, Inc., 803 N.W.2d 106 , 109–10 (Iowa 2011)). 2013Still, there must be enough in the statute to “clearly imply the statute protects the specific employment activity in question from employer retaliation.” Berry, 803 N.W.2d at 111 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.green2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 1 | 2 |
Teachout v. Forest City Community School Districtgreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 1 | 2 |
Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.green2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 , 303– 06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766–67 (finding sufficient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286–88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300–01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. 2015See, e.g., Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293, 303-06 (Iowa 2013) (reporting violations of law regarding health and safety of patients in an assisted living facility); Jasper, 764 N.W.2d at 766-67 (finding suffi- eient public policy rationale in administrative rule regarding ratio of children to daycare providers); Fitzgerald, 613 N.W.2d at 286-88 (refusing to commit or suborn perjury); Teachout, 584 N.W.2d at 300-01 (reporting of child abuse); Tullis v. Merrill, 584 N.W.2d 236, 239 (Iowa 1998) (complaining that company was not paying insurance benefits); Lara v. | 1 | 2 |
Weinzetl v. Ruan Single Source Transportation Co.green1 sentence2015Co., 587 N.W.2d 809, 811-12 (Iowa Ct. App. 1998) (referencing Yockey v. State, 540 N.W.2d 418, 421 (Iowa 1995) and Graves, 576 N.W.2d at 629 ). 12 In the present case, we find jury instruction 12 did not misstate the workers’ compensation public-policy exception to Iowa’s at-will employment law doctrine. | 1 | 1 |
Yockey v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Co., 587 N.W.2d 809, 811-12 (Iowa Ct. App. 1998) (referencing Yockey v. State, 540 N.W.2d 418, 421 (Iowa 1995) and Graves, 576 N.W.2d at 629 ). 12 In the present case, we find jury instruction 12 did not misstate the workers’ compensation public-policy exception to Iowa’s at-will employment law doctrine. | 1 | 1 |
Harvey v. Care Initiatives, Inc.green1 sentence2013See Harvey, 634 N.W.2d at 686 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Graves v. O'HARA
green
1 sentence2015Co., 587 N.W.2d 809, 811-12 (Iowa Ct. App. 1998) (referencing Yockey v. State, 540 N.W.2d 418, 421 (Iowa 1995) and Graves, 576 N.W.2d at 629 ). 12 In the present case, we find jury instruction 12 did not misstate the workers’ compensation public-policy exception to Iowa’s at-will employment law doctrine. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.