quiet title claim in Nevada

2016And in Clay v. Scheeline Banking & Trust Co., the court recognized that the statute authorizing a person to bring a quiet title claim against another who claims adversely, now numbered NRS 40.010, essentially codified the court's existing equity jurisprudence, stating that "there is practically no difference in the nature of the action under our statute and as it exists independent of statute." 40 Nev. 9, 16-17 , 159 P. 1081, 1082 (1916).

2016And in Clay v. Scheeline Banking & Trust Co., the court recognized that the statute authorizing a person to bring a quiet title claim against another who claims adversely, now numbered NRS 40.010, essentially codified the court's existing equity jurisprudence, stating that "there is practically no difference in the nature of the action under our statute and as it exists independent of statute." 40 Nev. 9, 16-17 , 159 P. 1081, 1082 (1916).

2022Appellant has also cited to Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 605 S.W.2d 848, 853 (Tex. 1980), which observed that "[o]ne may also receive something by way of settlement, even of substantial value, under an uncertain claim without making an election which bars recovery against another person." Appellant, however, did not provide either of these authorities to the district court.

2022Appellant has also cited to Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 605 S.W.2d 848, 853 (Tex. 1980), which observed that "[o]ne may also receive something by way of settlement, even of substantial value, under an uncertain claim without making an election which bars recovery against another person." Appellant, however, did not provide either of these authorities to the district court.

2022Sunset 2050 Tr. v. Nationstar Mortg., 134 Nev. 352 , 354, 420 P.3d 1032, 1034-35 (2018) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to prove "good title (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669 , 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996))), because the court merely permitted Cornwell to come forward with rebuttal evidence to show that payments were made, cf. Weaver v. State Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 494, 501 , 117 P.3d 193, 198 (2005) (concluding that the decision to allow a party to present evidence to rebut the administrative law judge's conc

2022Sunset 2050 Tr. v. Nationstar Mortg., 134 Nev. 352 , 354, 420 P.3d 1032, 1034-35 (2018) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to prove "good title (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669 , 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996))), because the court merely permitted Cornwell to come forward with rebuttal evidence to show that payments were made, cf. Weaver v. State Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 494, 501 , 117 P.3d 193, 198 (2005) (concluding that the decision to allow a party to present evidence to rebut the administrative law judge's conc

2022Sunset 2050 Tr. v. Nationstar Mortg., 134 Nev. 352 , 354, 420 P.3d 1032, 1034-35 (2018) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to prove "good title (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669 , 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996))), because the court merely permitted Cornwell to come forward with rebuttal evidence to show that payments were made, cf. Weaver v. State Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 494, 501 , 117 P.3d 193, 198 (2005) (concluding that the decision to allow a party to present evidence to rebut the administrative law judge's conc

2022Sunset 2050 Tr. v. Nationstar Mortg., 134 Nev. 352 , 354, 420 P.3d 1032, 1034-35 (2018) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to prove "good title (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669 , 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996))), because the court merely permitted Cornwell to come forward with rebuttal evidence to show that payments were made, cf. Weaver v. State Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 494, 501 , 117 P.3d 193, 198 (2005) (concluding that the decision to allow a party to present evidence to rebut the administrative law judge's conc

2022Sunset 2050 Tr. v. Nationstar Mortg., 134 Nev. 352 , 354, 420 P.3d 1032, 1034-35 (2018) (noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to prove "good title (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669 , 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996))), because the court merely permitted Cornwell to come forward with rebuttal evidence to show that payments were made, cf. Weaver v. State Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 494, 501 , 117 P.3d 193, 198 (2005) (concluding that the decision to allow a party to present evidence to rebut the administrative law judge's conc

2021The first part of appellant's fourth argument implicates this court's decision in Berberich v. Bank of America, N.A., 136 Nev. 93, 97, 460 P.3d 440, 443 (2020), which addressed when a quiet title claim accrues for purposes of triggering NRS 11.080s five-year limitations period. that it is a party's responsibility to present cogent arguments supported by salient authority). 7Lewis's argument regarding the district court's reliance on documents outside of her complaint primarily pertains to the district court's finding that she was in default on her HOA dues.

2021The first part of appellant's fourth argument implicates this court's decision in Berberich v. Bank of America, N.A., 136 Nev. 93 , 97, 460 P.3d 440, 443 (2020), which addressed when a quiet title claim accrues for purposes of triggering NRS 11.080s five-year limitations period. that it is a party's responsibility to present cogent arguments supported by salient authority). 7Lewis's argument regarding the district court's reliance on documents outside of her complaint primarily pertains to the district court's finding that she was in default on her HOA dues.

2014Servs., Inc., 129 Nev. , 310 P.3d 555, 559 (2013) (recognizing that a quiet title claim is exempt from NRS 38.310's mediation requirement).