continuous representation tolled the statute doctrine (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

continuous representation tolled the statute doctrine in New York

8 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Shumsky v. Eisensteingreen
ny · 2001 · cited in 5 New York opinions naming this issue, 2002–2013
2 sentences

2013We further conclude, however, that plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001]).

2013We further conclude, however, that plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001]).

45
Sommers v. Cohengreen
nyappdiv · 2005 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008The doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations at least until that date (see Sommers v Cohen, 14 AD3d 691, 692-693 [2005]; Gaslow v Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon, 286 AD2d 703, 706 [2001]; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 169-170 ).

11
Gaslow v. Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon, L. L. P.green
nyappdiv · 2001 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008The doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations at least until that date (see Sommers v Cohen, 14 AD3d 691, 692-693 [2005]; Gaslow v Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon, 286 AD2d 703, 706 [2001]; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 169-170 ).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Dischiavi v. Calli green
nyappdiv · 2013
2 sentences

2015Again in Dischiavi II, we affirmed that part of the order on appeal that denied the various defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the ground “that plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations” ( 111 AD3d at 1260-1261 ).

2015Again in Dischiavi II, we affirmed that part of the order on appeal that denied the various defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the ground “that plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations” ( 111 AD3d at 1260-1261 ).

32015–2015

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check