Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fuggazzattogreen2 sentences2021Since the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under Indictment No. 6573/06, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment under Indictment No. 7484/14 ( see id. ; People v Lewis , 135 AD3d 961, 962 ; People v Washington , 93 AD3d 681, 682 ; cf. People v Fuggazzatto , 62 NY2d 862, 863 ). 2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding the amended judgment under superior court information No. 553/09, the amended judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment under superior court information No. 553/09 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 5 | 6 |
People v. Pembertongreen2 sentences2021Since the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under Indictment No. 6573/06, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment under Indictment No. 7484/14 ( see id. ; People v Lewis , 135 AD3d 961, 962 ; People v Washington , 93 AD3d 681, 682 ; cf. People v Fuggazzatto , 62 NY2d 862, 863 ). 2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding the amended judgment under superior court information No. 553/09, the amended judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment under superior court information No. 553/09 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 3 | 4 |
Matter of Zamora v. New York Neurologic Associatesgreen2 sentences2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under indictment No. 897/13, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment on indictment No. 2162/10 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Williams, 17 NY3d 834, 836 [2011]; People v Pichardo, 1 NY3d 126, 129 [2003]; People v Taylor, 80 NY2d 1, 15 [1992]; People v Boston, 75 NY2d 585, 589 [1990]; People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). 2014The defendant raises no independent claim on the appeals with respect to his conviction relating to the weapon possession indictment, but the judgment on that indictment must be re versed inasmuch as his plea of guilty in that case was premised on the promise of a sentence that would run concurrently with the sentence imposed on the drug indictment (see People v Williams, 17 NY3d 834, 836 [2011]; People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Taylorgreen1 sentence2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under indictment No. 897/13, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment on indictment No. 2162/10 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Williams, 17 NY3d 834, 836 [2011]; People v Pichardo, 1 NY3d 126, 129 [2003]; People v Taylor, 80 NY2d 1, 15 [1992]; People v Boston, 75 NY2d 585, 589 [1990]; People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bostongreen1 sentence2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under indictment No. 897/13, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment on indictment No. 2162/10 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Williams, 17 NY3d 834, 836 [2011]; People v Pichardo, 1 NY3d 126, 129 [2003]; People v Taylor, 80 NY2d 1, 15 [1992]; People v Boston, 75 NY2d 585, 589 [1990]; People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Pichardogreen1 sentence2016Inasmuch as the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under indictment No. 897/13, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment on indictment No. 2162/10 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Williams, 17 NY3d 834, 836 [2011]; People v Pichardo, 1 NY3d 126, 129 [2003]; People v Taylor, 80 NY2d 1, 15 [1992]; People v Boston, 75 NY2d 585, 589 [1990]; People v Fuggazzatto, 62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bakergreen1 sentence2014Since the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction of robbery in the third degree under indictment No. 518-09, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment convicting the defendant of assault in the first degree and petit larceny under indictment No. 3306-08 (see People v Washington, 93 AD3d 681, 682 [2012]; cf. People v Baker, 20 NY3d 354, 364 [2013]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Larareyes
neutral
2 sentences2025Since the defendant raises no independent claim regarding these Queens County convictions, these judgments must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the Kings County judgments ( see People v Bello , 198 AD3d 668 , 668-669; People v Lewis , 135 AD3d 961, 962 ). 2021Since the defendant raises no independent claim regarding his conviction under Indictment No. 6573/06, that judgment must be affirmed in light of the affirmance of the judgment under Indictment No. 7484/14 ( see id. ; People v Lewis , 135 AD3d 961, 962 ; People v Washington , 93 AD3d 681, 682 ; cf. People v Fuggazzatto , 62 NY2d 862, 863 ). | 2 | 2021–2025 |