Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Allengreen2 sentences2012Any prejudice resulting from the Ventimiglia violation was alleviated by the court’s curative instruction (see People v Allen, 78 AD3d 1521, 1521 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 827 [2011]). 2012Any prejudice resulting from the Ventimiglia violation was alleviated by the court’s curative instruction (see People v Allen, 78 AD3d 1521, 1521 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 827 [2011]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Stultzgreen2 sentences2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). 2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Ortizgreen2 sentences2012Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based on a violation of the court’s Ventimiglia ruling (see generally People v Ortiz, 54 NY2d 288, 292 [1981]). 2012Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based on a violation of the court’s Ventimiglia ruling (see generally People v Ortiz, 54 NY2d 288, 292 [1981]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Fuentesgreen1 sentence2011To establish such a violation “a defendant must show that (1) the evidence is favorable to the defendant because it is either exculpatory or impeaching in nature; (2) the evidence was suppressed by the prosecution; and (3) prejudice arose because the suppressed evidence was material” (People v Fuentes, 12 NY3d 259, 263 [2009]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Town of Parma v. Lynchesky
green
2 sentences2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). 2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). | 3 | 2012–2012 |
People v. Jablonski
green
2 sentences2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). 2012“It is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to ‘make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Noguel, 93 AD3d 1319 , 1320 [2012], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 702 [2004]). | 3 | 2012–2012 |
New York Ass'n of Homes & Services for Aging, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Health
green
1 sentence1997There was no showing that any juror had read the newspaper article in question, the court’s inquiry into the matter was adequate, and its curative instructions eliminated any likelihood of prejudice (People v Velez, 222 AD2d 539 , lv denied 87 NY2d 978 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Velez
green
1 sentence1997There was no showing that any juror had read the newspaper article in question, the court’s inquiry into the matter was adequate, and its curative instructions eliminated any likelihood of prejudice (People v Velez, 222 AD2d 539 , lv denied 87 NY2d 978 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.