Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Slidergreen2 sentences1990See State v. Slider (1980), 70 Ohio App. 2d 283 [24 O.O. 3d 387]; State v. Maynard (June 24, 1976), Franklin App. No. 75 AP-676, unreported." Id. at 341-342 . 1990See State v. Slider (1980), 70 Ohio App. 2d 283 [24 O.O. 3d 387]; State v. Maynard (June 24, 1976), Franklin App. No. 75 AP-676, unreported." Id. at 341-342 . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. White
green
2 sentences2005Corr., 96 Ohio St.3d 72 , 2002-Ohio-3528 , 771 N.E.2d 254 . "[W]here a trial court's sentence exceeds the minimum established for consecutive terms, such judgment is not the basis of a reversible error, as the terms of [R.C. 2929.41 (E)(2)] are self-executing, automatically operating to limit the aggregate minimum sentencing to fifteen years." State v. White (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 340 , 341 , 481 N.E.2d 596 . 2005Corr., 96 Ohio St.3d 72 , 2002-Ohio-3528 , 771 N.E.2d 254 . "[W]here a trial court's sentence exceeds the minimum established for consecutive terms, such judgment is not the basis of a reversible error, as the terms of [R.C. 2929.41 (E)(2)] are self-executing, automatically operating to limit the aggregate minimum sentencing to fifteen years." State v. White (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 340 , 341 , 481 N.E.2d 596 . | 7 | 1987–2005 |
State ex rel. Hamann v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
green
1 sentence2005Corr., 96 Ohio St.3d 72 , 2002-Ohio-3528 , 771 N.E.2d 254 . "[W]here a trial court's sentence exceeds the minimum established for consecutive terms, such judgment is not the basis of a reversible error, as the terms of [R.C. 2929.41 (E)(2)] are self-executing, automatically operating to limit the aggregate minimum sentencing to fifteen years." State v. White (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 340 , 341 , 481 N.E.2d 596 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State ex rel. Hamann v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
neutral
1 sentence2005Corr., 96 Ohio St.3d 72 , 2002-Ohio-3528 , 771 N.E.2d 254 . "[W]here a trial court's sentence exceeds the minimum established for consecutive terms, such judgment is not the basis of a reversible error, as the terms of [R.C. 2929.41 (E)(2)] are self-executing, automatically operating to limit the aggregate minimum sentencing to fifteen years." State v. White (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 340 , 341 , 481 N.E.2d 596 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.