Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Singer v. Dickinsongreen2 sentences2021Id. at ¶ 14; see also Singer v. Dickinson, 63 Ohio St.3d 408 , 588 N.E.2d 806, 807 (1992)(allocation of the dependency exemption may be awarded to the noncustodial parent when that allocation would produce a net tax savings for the parents, thereby furthering the best interest of the child.) {¶30} Although I am troubled by the failure of Appellee to offer any evidence regarding his current employer or projected income in Tax Year 2020, I find that the evidence offered at the hearing establishes that Appellant had no taxable income that year. 2021Id. at ¶ 14; see also Singer v. Dickinson, 63 Ohio St.3d 408 , 588 N.E.2d 806, 807 (1992)(allocation of the dependency exemption may be awarded to the noncustodial parent when that allocation would produce a net tax savings for the parents, thereby furthering the best interest of the child.) {¶30} Although I am troubled by the failure of Appellee to offer any evidence regarding his current employer or projected income in Tax Year 2020, I find that the evidence offered at the hearing establishes that Appellant had no taxable income that year. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Franklingreen2 sentences2001See, e.g . , State v. Franklin (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 101 , 103 , 619 N.E.2d 1182 , 1184 . 2001See, e.g . , State v. Franklin (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 101 , 103 , 619 N.E.2d 1182 , 1184 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2016(Emphasis omitted.) State v. Tate, 140 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2014-Ohio-3667 , 19 N.E.3d 888 , ¶ 18 (appellate court was required to consider the defendant’s own testimony in evaluating sufficiency of evidence to support his convictions following bench trial), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.E.2d 560 (1979). {¶32} In contrast to a challenge based on sufficiency of the evidence, a manifest weight challenge attacks the credibility of the evidence presented and questions whether the state met its burden of persuasion. 2016(Emphasis omitted.) State v. Tate, 140 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2014-Ohio-3667 , 19 N.E.3d 888 , ¶ 18 (appellate court was required to consider the defendant’s own testimony in evaluating sufficiency of evidence to support his convictions following bench trial), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.E.2d 560 (1979). {¶32} In contrast to a challenge based on sufficiency of the evidence, a manifest weight challenge attacks the credibility of the evidence presented and questions whether the state met its burden of persuasion. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Tate (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2016(Emphasis omitted.) State v. Tate, 140 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2014-Ohio-3667 , 19 N.E.3d 888 , ¶ 18 (appellate court was required to consider the defendant’s own testimony in evaluating sufficiency of evidence to support his convictions following bench trial), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.E.2d 560 (1979). {¶32} In contrast to a challenge based on sufficiency of the evidence, a manifest weight challenge attacks the credibility of the evidence presented and questions whether the state met its burden of persuasion. 2016(Emphasis omitted.) State v. Tate, 140 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2014-Ohio-3667 , 19 N.E.3d 888 , ¶ 18 (appellate court was required to consider the defendant’s own testimony in evaluating sufficiency of evidence to support his convictions following bench trial), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.E.2d 560 (1979). {¶32} In contrast to a challenge based on sufficiency of the evidence, a manifest weight challenge attacks the credibility of the evidence presented and questions whether the state met its burden of persuasion. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Blakemore v. Blakemore
green
1 sentence2009Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217 , 219 . {¶ 17} In her first assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the receivers' motion to vacate her mortgage because (1) the winning bid was objectively inadequate; and (2) the evidence offered at the hearing below by her expert witnesses established the "auction was incompetently carried *Page 7 out." Under this assignment, appellant also argues that the trial court abused its discretion because it "improperly balanced" her interest, $105,000 in 30 S. River Road with the receivers' inter | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State ex rel. Delco Moraine Division v. Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence2008Comm. (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 43 , 44 . {¶ 51} The evidence offered at the hearing clearly and convincingly supports the trial court's finding of contempt. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Thompkins
green
1 sentence2004State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 , 386 , 1997-Ohio-52 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Thompkins
red
1 sentence2004State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 , 386 , 1997-Ohio-52 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2001From the evidence offered at the hearing on Bush's motion to suppress, it is beyond doubt that the officers had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that Bush might be the fleeing drug trafficker, and their brief detention of him while they questioned his identity was a constitutionally legitimate seizure of his person, pursuant to Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 . 2001From the evidence offered at the hearing on Bush's motion to suppress, it is beyond doubt that the officers had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that Bush might be the fleeing drug trafficker, and their brief detention of him while they questioned his identity was a constitutionally legitimate seizure of his person, pursuant to Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Colley v. Bazell
green
1 sentence2000The determination of whether excusable or inexcusable neglect has occurred "must of necessity take into consideration all the surrounding facts and circumstances." Colley v. Bazell (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 243 , 249 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Martin v. Ohio
green
1 sentence2000In Martin v. Ohio (1987), 480 U.S. 228 , the court ruled that Ohio may place the burden of proving self-defense upon the accused which is codified in R.C. 2901.05 and states: (A) * * *. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.