Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
T.D. v. C.N.green1 sentence2025See generally Copas v. Luikart, 2025-Ohio-1694, ¶ 11, 13, 15, 47 (12th Dist.) (trial court denied motion it construed as a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment granting a CSPO on merits, and appellate court affirmed); T.D. v. C.N., 2018-Ohio-1840, ¶ 25, 44 (8th Dist.) (trial court did not abuse discretion in denying Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment Vinton App. No. 25CA706 7 granting a CSPO because there were no allegations of operative facts to show relief was warranted). {¶10} Mason’s motion to vacate did not argue that the original circumstances materially changed, and ev | 1 | 1 |
Copas v. Luikartgreen1 sentence2025See generally Copas v. Luikart, 2025-Ohio-1694, ¶ 11, 13, 15, 47 (12th Dist.) (trial court denied motion it construed as a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment granting a CSPO on merits, and appellate court affirmed); T.D. v. C.N., 2018-Ohio-1840, ¶ 25, 44 (8th Dist.) (trial court did not abuse discretion in denying Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment Vinton App. No. 25CA706 7 granting a CSPO because there were no allegations of operative facts to show relief was warranted). {¶10} Mason’s motion to vacate did not argue that the original circumstances materially changed, and ev | 1 | 1 |
State v. Messengergreen1 sentence2024See Messenger, 2022-Ohio-4562, at ¶ 27 ; Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d at 340 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2018See State v. Roberts , 110 Ohio St.3d 71 , 2006-Ohio-3665 , 850 N.E.2d 1168 , ¶ 160. *488 {¶ 40} Two significant flaws are apparent in Mason's claim. 2018See State v. Roberts , 110 Ohio St.3d 71 , 2006-Ohio-3665 , 850 N.E.2d 1168 , ¶ 160. *488 {¶ 40} Two significant flaws are apparent in Mason's claim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hayesgreen2 sentences2016See Craig, 116 Ohio St.3d 135 , 2007-Ohio-5752 , 876 N.E.2d 957 , at ¶ 13, citing Hayes, 25 Ohio St.3d at 175 , 495 N.E.2d 578 . 2016See Craig, 116 Ohio St.3d 135 , 2007-Ohio-5752 , 876 N.E.2d 957 , at ¶ 13, citing Hayes, 25 Ohio St.3d at 175 , 495 N.E.2d 578 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cooeygreen2 sentences2016See State v. Cooey, 46 Ohio St.3d 20 , 544 N.E.2d 895 (1989), paragraph three of the syllabus ("Only the aggravating circumstances related to a given count may be considered in assessing the penalty for that count."), superseded by constitutional amendment on other grounds, State v. Smith, 80 Ohio St.3d 89 , 684 N.E.2d 668 (1997) ; R.C. 2929.03(D)(2) (1981) (current version at R.C. 2929.43(D)(2) (2008)). {¶ 29} The stark differences between Ohio's and Florida's death-penalty statutes are outcome-determinative for Mason's challenge to Ohio's death-penalty statute under Hurst . 2016See State v. Cooey, 46 Ohio St.3d 20 , 544 N.E.2d 895 (1989), paragraph three of the syllabus ("Only the aggravating circumstances related to a given count may be considered in assessing the penalty for that count."), superseded by constitutional amendment on other grounds, State v. Smith, 80 Ohio St.3d 89 , 684 N.E.2d 668 (1997) ; R.C. 2929.03(D)(2) (1981) (current version at R.C. 2929.43(D)(2) (2008)). {¶ 29} The stark differences between Ohio's and Florida's death-penalty statutes are outcome-determinative for Mason's challenge to Ohio's death-penalty statute under Hurst . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence2016See State v. Cooey, 46 Ohio St.3d 20 , 544 N.E.2d 895 (1989), paragraph three of the syllabus ("Only the aggravating circumstances related to a given count may be considered in assessing the penalty for that count."), superseded by constitutional amendment on other grounds, State v. Smith, 80 Ohio St.3d 89 , 684 N.E.2d 668 (1997) ; R.C. 2929.03(D)(2) (1981) (current version at R.C. 2929.43(D)(2) (2008)). {¶ 29} The stark differences between Ohio's and Florida's death-penalty statutes are outcome-determinative for Mason's challenge to Ohio's death-penalty statute under Hurst . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Craiggreen1 sentence2016See Craig, 116 Ohio St.3d 135 , 2007-Ohio-5752 , 876 N.E.2d 957 , at ¶ 13, citing Hayes, 25 Ohio St.3d at 175 , 495 N.E.2d 578 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Carbone, 07 Ma 147 (3-17-2008)
neutral
1 sentence2025Bank v. Williams, 2008-Ohio-1675 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist.)” to support his position that “[p]rotection orders cannot lawfully be used as bargaining chips or procedural tools in criminal cases absent an independent legal basis.” In addition, he asserted that the trial court “made no findings of fact or reference to any evidence” in the CSPO and that “due process requires adequate findings in the record and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before any liberty interest is restricted.” {¶4} On June 4, 2025, the trial court issued an entry denying Mason’s motion. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Otten
green
1 sentence2024See Messenger, 2022-Ohio-4562, at ¶ 27 ; Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d at 340 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Hurst v. Florida
green
2 sentences2018He relied on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616 , 624, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), which invalidated Florida's former capital-sentencing scheme because it "required the judge alone to find the existence of an aggravating circumstance." The trial court granted Mason's motion, and the state appealed to the Third District Court of Appeals, which reversed the judgment and remanded the case. {¶ 4} On appeal here, Mason argues that Ohio's death-penalty scheme is unconstitutional under Hurst . 2018He relied on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616 , 624, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), which invalidated Florida's former capital-sentencing scheme because it "required the judge alone to find the existence of an aggravating circumstance." The trial court granted Mason's motion, and the state appealed to the Third District Court of Appeals, which reversed the judgment and remanded the case. {¶ 4} On appeal here, Mason argues that Ohio's death-penalty scheme is unconstitutional under Hurst . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2016Assignment of Error No. I The trial court erred as a matter of law in failing to apply binding precedent from the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. Belton, [ 149 Ohio St.3d 165 ] 2016-Ohio-1581 [ 74 N.E.3d 319 ] (April 20, 2016) to reject Mason's claim that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury finding that aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. 2016Assignment of Error No. I The trial court erred as a matter of law in failing to apply binding precedent from the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. Belton, [ 149 Ohio St.3d 165 ] 2016-Ohio-1581 [ 74 N.E.3d 319 ] (April 20, 2016) to reject Mason's claim that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury finding that aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Abelt
neutral
2 sentences2005The state also argues that the cause of death was undisputed, as the coroner's report stated the death in this case was a result of "bronchopneumonia due to remote blunt impact to the head." In support of its proposition that appellant's pointing to questions about the cause of death was not enough to warrant a state funded expert, the state cites to State v. Abelt (2001), 144 Ohio App.3d 168 . 2005The state also argues that the cause of death was undisputed, as the coroner's report stated the death in this case was a result of "bronchopneumonia due to remote blunt impact to the head." In support of its proposition that appellant's pointing to questions about the cause of death was not enough to warrant a state funded expert, the state cites to State v. Abelt (2001), 144 Ohio App.3d 168 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Carpenter
green
1 sentence2004State v. Carpenter (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 615 , {¶ 58} While the prosecutor's comments about Mason's plea agreement were inartful, they were technically accurate. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State ex rel. Ruffin v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences2000Taxpayers Coalition v. Lakewood (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 385, 391 , 715 N.E.2d 179 , 184 (court need not consider merits of claims that relators could have, but did not, raise and that parties did not consent to have tried). {¶ 20} Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals did not err by confining its judgment to Mason’s claim that Judge Griffin had a duty to conduct a sexual- predator-classification hearing. 2000Taxpayers Coalition v. Lakewood (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 385, 391 , 715 N.E.2d 179 , 184 (court need not consider merits of claims that relators could have, but did not, raise and that parties did not consent to have tried). {¶ 20} Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals did not err by confining its judgment to Mason’s claim that Judge Griffin had a duty to conduct a sexual- predator-classification hearing. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Foster v. McDevitt
green
2 sentences1990Foster v. McDevitt (1986), 31 Ohio App.3d 237 , 31 OBR 520, 511 N.E.2d 403 . *318 Mason’s third assignment of error is overruled. 1990Foster v. McDevitt (1986), 31 Ohio App.3d 237 , 31 OBR 520, 511 N.E.2d 403 . *318 Mason’s third assignment of error is overruled. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.