Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grava v. Parkman Townshipgreen2 sentences2025AJZ’s Hauling at ¶ 16; Grava v. Parkman Twp., 73 Ohio St.3d 379, 381 (1995). 2008However, in Grava v. Parkman Twp. , 73 Ohio St.3d 379 , 1995-Ohio-331 , the Supreme Court of Ohio noted that the doctrine of res judicata encompasses both claim preclusion and issue preclusion (referred to as collateral estoppel.) The difference between the two is that res judicata requires an identity of the parties and causes of action whereas collateral estoppel may have a preclusive effect where the cause of action in a subsequent lawsuit is different. | 2 | 5 |
State v. C.H.green1 sentence2026State v. C.L.H., 2019-Ohio-3786, ¶ 15 (10th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daniel v. Williams
green
1 sentence2023Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In re Ohio Power Co.
green
1 sentence2022In re Ohio Power Co., 144 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2015-Ohio-2056 , ¶ 20. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Grava v. Parkman Twp.
green
1 sentence2008However, in Grava v. Parkman Twp. , 73 Ohio St.3d 379 , 1995-Ohio-331 , the Supreme Court of Ohio noted that the doctrine of res judicata encompasses both claim preclusion and issue preclusion (referred to as collateral estoppel.) The difference between the two is that res judicata requires an identity of the parties and causes of action whereas collateral estoppel may have a preclusive effect where the cause of action in a subsequent lawsuit is different. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.