Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Portland School District No. 1
green
2 sentences2019As this court has previously observed, "The doctrine of substantial compliance has previously been used * * * to avoid the harsh results of insisting on literal compliance with statutory notice provisions where the purpose of these requirements has been met." Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1 , 291 Or. 77 , 81, 628 P.2d 1183 (1981) (internal citation omitted). 2019As this court has previously observed, "The doctrine of substantial compliance has previously been used * * * to avoid the harsh results of insisting on literal compliance with statutory notice provisions where the purpose of these requirements has been met." Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1 , 291 Or. 77 , 81, 628 P.2d 1183 (1981) (internal citation omitted). | 5 | 1982–2023 |
Rogers v. Roberts
green
2 sentences1995Rogers v. Roberts, 300 Or 687, 691-92 , 717 P2d 620 (1986). 1995Rogers v. Roberts, 300 Or 687, 691-92 , 717 P2d 620 (1986). | 2 | 1992–1995 |
Friends of the Columbia Gorge v. Energy Facility Siting Council
green
2 sentences2023Siting Coun., 365 Or 371, 389 , 446 P3d 53 (2019) (quoting Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or 77, 81 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981) (omission in Friends of the Columbia Gorge)). 2023Siting Coun., 365 Or 371, 389 , 446 P3d 53 (2019) (quoting Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or 77, 81 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981) (omission in Friends of the Columbia Gorge)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
McComas v. Employment Department
neutral
1 sentence2001In holding that the state’s notice substantially complied, the court held: “ ‘The sufficiency of the notice given must be determined with the object of the statute in mind and technically deficient claims should not be barred where the purpose of the statute is served. * * * The doctrine of substantial compliance has previously been used by this court to avoid the harsh results of insisting on literal compliance with statutory notice requirements where the purpose of the requirements has been met.’ ” McComas, 133 Or App at 580 (quoting Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or 77, 81 , 628 P2d | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Urban Renewal Agency v. Lackey
green
2 sentences1981In Urban Renewal, supra, we held that the purpose of the Tort Claims Act notice sections is to give the public body timely notice of the tort claim and to allow its officers an opportunity to investigate matters promptly and ascertain all necessary facts. 275 Or. at 41 , 549 P.2d 657 . 1981In Urban Renewal, supra, we held that the purpose of the Tort Claims Act notice sections is to give the public body timely notice of the tort claim and to allow its officers an opportunity to investigate matters promptly and ascertain all necessary facts. 275 Or. at 41 , 549 P.2d 657 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.