Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. SAIF Corp.green2 sentences2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , 2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , | 1 | 1 |
AIG Claim Services Inc. v. Colegreen2 sentences2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , 2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , | 1 | 1 |
Tracy v. Lane Countygreen2 sentences1991See also Tracy v. Lane County, 305 Or 378, 382 , 752 P2d 300 (1988) (Employment Relations Board’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.752(1) is primary, even if not exclusive). 1991See also Tracy v. Lane County, 305 Or 378, 382 , 752 P2d 300 (1988) (Employment Relations Board’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.752(1) is primary, even if not exclusive). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hibbs v. Sedgwick CMS (A180280)
neutral
2 sentences2025Cite as 340 Or App 421 (2025) 427 As relevant to this appeal, ORS 656.262(11)(a) pro- vides an exception to the general division of review author- ity in one circumstance—when proceedings concern “solely the assessment and payment of the additional amount and attorney fees described in” ORS 656.262(11). 2025Cite as 340 Or App 421 (2025) 427 As relevant to this appeal, ORS 656.262(11)(a) pro- vides an exception to the general division of review author- ity in one circumstance—when proceedings concern “solely the assessment and payment of the additional amount and attorney fees described in” ORS 656.262(11). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Schlecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
green
2 sentences2010Affirmed. 1 The Nationwide policy limit was $100,000, but that sum was reduced by the $50,000 paid by Lopez’s insurer. 2 There is no transcript of the summary judgment hearing. 5 “5 ORS 656.704(3) provides in part: “ ‘[Mlatters concerning a claim under ORS 656.001 to 656.794 are those matters in which a worker’s right to receive compensation, or the amount thereof, are directly in issue.’ 6 “6 In Schlecht v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982), the Court of Appeals also came to the conclusion that this type of proceeding is a matter concerning a claim.” 2010Affirmed. 1 The Nationwide policy limit was $100,000, but that sum was reduced by the $50,000 paid by Lopez’s insurer. 2 There is no transcript of the summary judgment hearing. 5 “5 ORS 656.704(3) provides in part: “ ‘[Mlatters concerning a claim under ORS 656.001 to 656.794 are those matters in which a worker’s right to receive compensation, or the amount thereof, are directly in issue.’ 6 “6 In Schlecht v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982), the Court of Appeals also came to the conclusion that this type of proceeding is a matter concerning a claim.” | 2 | 1991–2010 |
Howard v. Liberty Northwest Insurance
green
2 sentences2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , 2013The issue in this case was whether “a sufficient causal relationship exist [ed]” between claimant’s requested medical services and her previously accepted claim — an issue which, pursuant to the terms of subparagraph (3)(b)(C), constituted “a matter concerning a claim.” Simply, the board, has exclusive authority, under ORS 656.704, over “matters concerning a claim ***.” See, e.g., Martin v. SAIF, 247 Or App 377, 382 , 270 P3d 296 (2011) (“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review authority over matters concerning a claim[.]”); AIG Claim Services v. Cole, 205 Or App 170, 174 , | 1 | 2013–2013 |
EBI Companies v. Cooper
green
2 sentences1998In EBI Companies v. Cooper, 100 Or App 246, 248-49 , 785 P2d 380 (1990), we held that a dispute concerning the claimant’s right to rescind an election under ORS 656.591 and the proper distribution of third-party settlement proceeds was a matter concerning a claim “because the worker’s right to receive compensation is directly in issue. 1998In EBI Companies v. Cooper, 100 Or App 246, 248-49 , 785 P2d 380 (1990), we held that a dispute concerning the claimant’s right to rescind an election under ORS 656.591 and the proper distribution of third-party settlement proceeds was a matter concerning a claim “because the worker’s right to receive compensation is directly in issue. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Harvey v. Lou Surcamp Logging
neutral
2 sentences1998ORS 656.591 gives the Board jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of an election by a worker to assign his third-party claim to a paying agency.” (Citations omitted.) In Harvey v. Lou Surcamp Logging, 100 Or App 227 , 229-30 n 1, 785 P2d 383 (1990), we held that, because a matter concerning a claim includes a dispute involving whether settlement proceeds from a third-party claim should be distributed pursuant to ORS 656.591 or ORS 656.593, the Board had jurisdiction over the disposition of the proceeds. 1998ORS 656.591 gives the Board jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of an election by a worker to assign his third-party claim to a paying agency.” (Citations omitted.) In Harvey v. Lou Surcamp Logging, 100 Or App 227 , 229-30 n 1, 785 P2d 383 (1990), we held that, because a matter concerning a claim includes a dispute involving whether settlement proceeds from a third-party claim should be distributed pursuant to ORS 656.591 or ORS 656.593, the Board had jurisdiction over the disposition of the proceeds. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences1995PGE v. Bureau of Labor Industries, 317 Or 606, 610 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993). 1995PGE v. Bureau of Labor Industries, 317 Or 606, 610 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
EBI Companies v. Kemper Group/American Motorists Insurance
green
2 sentences1992We resolved that issue in EBI Companies v. Kemper Group Insurance, 92 Or App 319, 322 , 758 P2d 406 , rev den 307 Or 145 (1988), where we held that the Board lacked jurisdiction over a reimbursement dispute, because the dispute is not a matter concerning a claim. 1992We resolved that issue in EBI Companies v. Kemper Group Insurance, 92 Or App 319, 322 , 758 P2d 406 , rev den 307 Or 145 (1988), where we held that the Board lacked jurisdiction over a reimbursement dispute, because the dispute is not a matter concerning a claim. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Bernards v. Wright
green
2 sentences1991Bernards v. Wright, 93 Or App 192 , 760 P2d 1388 (1988). 4 ORS 656.576 defines “paying agency” as “the self-insured employer or insurer paying benefits to the worker or beneficiaries.” 5 ORS 656.704(3) provides in part: “[Mlatters concerning a claim under ORS 656.001 to 656.794 are those matters in which a worker’s right to receive compensation, or the amount thereof, are directly in issue.” 6 In Schlecht v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982), the Court of Appeals also came to the conclusion that this type of proceeding is a matter concerning a claim. 7 “As a matter of common law, 1991Bernards v. Wright, 93 Or App 192 , 760 P2d 1388 (1988). 4 ORS 656.576 defines “paying agency” as “the self-insured employer or insurer paying benefits to the worker or beneficiaries.” 5 ORS 656.704(3) provides in part: “[Mlatters concerning a claim under ORS 656.001 to 656.794 are those matters in which a worker’s right to receive compensation, or the amount thereof, are directly in issue.” 6 In Schlecht v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982), the Court of Appeals also came to the conclusion that this type of proceeding is a matter concerning a claim. 7 “As a matter of common law, | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.