per- manency hearing (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

per- manency hearing in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2023–2026 8 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Department of Human Services v. H. R.green
orctapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Compare id. at 373-75 , with Dept. of Human Services v. S. E.

2025Compare id. at 373-75 , with Dept. of Human Services v. S. E.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Department of Human Services v. S. M. H. green
orctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2024H., 283 Or App 295, 305 , 388 P3d 1204 (2017).

2024H., 283 Or App 295, 305 , 388 P3d 1204 (2017).

32023–2024
Dept. of Human Services v. L. B. green
orctapp · 2023
2 sentences

2023The court also adopted and included in its active efforts findings the description of DHS efforts reflected in (1) a letter from mother’s special- ized parent coach from Wise Choice Educational Solutions describing six parent coaching sessions and other “consul- tations,” (2) the DHS Family Report prepared for the per- manency hearing, and (3) the CASA’s most recent findings Cite as 325 Or App 176 (2023) 181 and recommendations contained in her report, detailing the efforts mentioned already as well as significant efforts used to actively involve the children’s tribe in family reunification wo

2023The court also adopted and included in its active efforts findings the description of DHS efforts reflected in (1) a letter from mother’s special- ized parent coach from Wise Choice Educational Solutions describing six parent coaching sessions and other “consul- tations,” (2) the DHS Family Report prepared for the per- manency hearing, and (3) the CASA’s most recent findings Cite as 325 Or App 176 (2023) 181 and recommendations contained in her report, detailing the efforts mentioned already as well as significant efforts used to actively involve the children’s tribe in family reunification wo

22023–2023
Dept. of Human Services v. K. D. neutral
orctapp · 2026
1 sentence

2026We further conclude that that the juvenile court did not err in determining on the record before it at the per- manency hearing that plans of adoption were best suited to Nonprecedential Memo Op: 346 Or App 710 (2026) 715 meet the health and safety needs of F and V and in chang- ing their permanency plans to adoption.

12026–2026

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.476 (6) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.645 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.498 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check