quasi-contractual claim (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

quasi-contractual claim in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Cron v. Zimmergreen
orctapp · 2013 · cited in 3 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2013–2016
2 sentences

2016“The elements of the quasi-contractual claim of unjust enrichment are (1) a benefit conferred, (2) awareness by the recipient that she has received the benefit, and (3) it would be unjust to allow the recipient to retain the benefit without requiring her to pay for it.” Cron v. Zimmer, 255 Or App 114, 130 , 296 P3d 567 (2013).

2016“The elements of the quasi-contractual claim of unjust enrichment are (1) a benefit conferred, (2) awareness by the recipient that she has received the benefit, and (3) it would be unjust to allow the recipient to retain the benefit without requiring her to pay for it.” Cron v. Zimmer, 255 Or App 114, 130 , 296 P3d 567 (2013).

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Jaqua v. Nike, Inc. green
orctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2016Jaqua v. Nike, Inc., 125 Or App 294 (1993).

2002As we described in Jaqua v. Nike, Inc., 125 *654 Or App 294, 865 P2d 442 (1993), the elements of the quasi-contractual claim of unjust enrichment are “a benefit conferred, awareness by the recipient that a benefit has been received and, under the circumstances, it would be unjust to allow retention of the benefit without requiring the recipient to pay for it.” Id. at 298.

41994–2016
Robinowitz v. Pozzi green
orctapp · 1994
2 sentences

2002Robinowitz v. Pozzi, 127 Or App 464, 467 , 872 P2d 993 , rev den, 320 Or 109 (1994).

2002Robinowitz v. Pozzi, 127 Or App 464, 467 , 872 P2d 993 , rev den, 320 Or 109 (1994).

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

IL 15 (1982–2020) PA 15 (1938–2026) NY 14 (1984–2026) TX 12 (1990–2024) OR 8 (1994–2016) MD 5 (1984–2023) LA 3 (1989–2014) OH 3 (2016–2025) DC 3 (1950–2005) AR 3 (1971–2016) CO 3 (1989–2014) AL 2 (1996–2000) AZ 2 (1980–2004) MO 2 (2004–2024) CA 2 (2017–2017) DE 2 (2025–2025) VT 2 (2006–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check