Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Murraygreen1 sentence2008“Adequate” means, as relevant here “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement, often : narrowly or barely sufficient: no more than satisfactory.” Id. at 25. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dept. of Human Services v. B. B.
neutral
2 sentences2023And “adequate” is defined as “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement” and “legally sufficient: such as is lawfully and reasonably sufficient.” Id. 2023And “adequate” is defined as “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement” and “legally sufficient: such as is lawfully and reasonably sufficient.” Id. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Bordeaux
green
2 sentences2014“Adequate” means, as relevant here “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement, often : narrowly or barely sufficient: no more than satisfactory.” Id. at 25.’ “[State v. Bordeaux, 220 Or App 165, 172 , 185 P3d 524 (2008)]. 2014“Adequate” means, as relevant here “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement, often : narrowly or barely sufficient: no more than satisfactory.” Id. at 25.’ “[State v. Bordeaux, 220 Or App 165, 172 , 185 P3d 524 (2008)]. | 2 | 2011–2014 |
State v. Blair
green
2 sentences2009"Adequate," in turn, is defined in part as "proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement; often: narrowly or barely sufficient: no more than satisfactory[.]" Id. (italics in original). 2009“Adequate,” in turn, is defined in part as “proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement; often : narrowly or barely sufficient : no more than satisfactory[.]” Id. (italics in original). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Anderson v. Klix Chemical Co.
green
1 sentence2021See Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary 25 (unabridged ed 2002) (defining “adequate” as “equal to, proportionate to, or fully sufficient for a specified or implied requirement, often : narrowly or barely sufficient : no more than satisfactory”). 266 Purdy v. Deere & Co./Norton Without the instruction, the jury did not necessarily under- stand that the adequacy of a warning should be assessed from the standpoint of the reasonably prudent person, rather than from the perspective of the product’s user, and that it should take into account the warning’s form as well as its content, Anderson, 256 | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Schmeiser v. Trus Joist Corporation
green
1 sentence2021Schmeiser, 273 Or at 133 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.