State responds that any error (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

State responds that any error in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2024 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Tison green
orctapp · 2018
2 sentences

2024“We review sentencing decisions for legal error.” State v. Tison, 292 Or App 369, 372 , 424 P3d 823 , rev den, 363 Or 744 (2018).

2024“We review sentencing decisions for legal error.” State v. Tison, 292 Or App 369, 372 , 424 P3d 823 , rev den, 363 Or 744 (2018).

22024–2024
Dillard v. Brown green
or · 2018
2 sentences

2024“We review sentencing decisions for legal error.” State v. Tison, 292 Or App 369, 372 , 424 P3d 823 , rev den, 363 Or 744 (2018).

2024“We review sentencing decisions for legal error.” State v. Tison, 292 Or App 369, 372 , 424 P3d 823 , rev den, 363 Or 744 (2018).

22024–2024
State v. Renard green
orctapp · 2022
2 sentences

2024We conclude that, pursuant to ORS 161.067(1) and State v. Renard, 319 Or App 282 , 509 P3d 760 , rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022), the alleged error is plain.

2024We conclude that, pursuant to ORS 161.067(1) and State v. Renard, 319 Or App 282 , 509 P3d 760 , rev den, 370 Or 212 (2022), the alleged error is plain.

12024–2024
State v. Breshears green
orctapp · 2016
2 sentences

2023We conclude that, under State v. Breshears, 281 Or App 552 , 383 P3d 345 (2016), the alleged errors are plain and, further, we exercise our discre- tion to correct them.

2023We conclude that, under State v. Breshears, 281 Or App 552 , 383 P3d 345 (2016), the alleged errors are plain and, further, we exercise our discre- tion to correct them.

12023–2023
State v. Vanornum green
or · 2013
1 sentence

2023An error is plain when it is “an error of law, obvious and not reasonably in dispute, and apparent on the record without requiring the court to choose among competing inferences.” State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629 , 317 P3d 3 Defendant also argues that, for the same reasons the trial court should have granted the MJOA, the trial court denied his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

12023–2023
State v. Baughman green
or · 2017
2 sentences

2018The state responds that any error in admitting the evidence was harmless, but that, if it was not harmless, then a limited remand is appropriate under State v. Baughman , 361 Or. 386 , 393 P.3d 1132 (2017). 3 We begin with the invocation issue.

2018The state responds that any error in admitting the evidence was harmless, but that, if it was not harmless, then a limited remand is appropriate under State v. Baughman , 361 Or. 386 , 393 P.3d 1132 (2017). 3 We begin with the invocation issue.

12018–2018
State v. Langmayer green
orctapp · 2010
2 sentences

2012However, after the parties’ briefed this case, this court held, in State v. Langmayer, 239 Or App 600 , 244 P3d 894 (2010), that including such a provision in a criminal judgment constitutes reversible error.

2012However, after the parties’ briefed this case, this court held, in State v. Langmayer, 239 Or App 600 , 244 P3d 894 (2010), that including such a provision in a criminal judgment constitutes reversible error.

12012–2012
State v. Hagberg green
or · 2008
2 sentences

2008For the reasons that follow, even assuming that the asserted error is “plain error” in light of State v. Hagberg, 345 Or 161 , 190 P3d 1209 (2008), 1 we decline to exercise our discretion under Ailes .

2008For the reasons that follow, even assuming that the asserted error is “plain error” in light of State v. Hagberg, 345 Or 161 , 190 P3d 1209 (2008), 1 we decline to exercise our discretion under Ailes .

12008–2008

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.015 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 8 (2008–2024) IL 6 (1981–2015) TX 4 (1999–2018) WI 2 (2021–2021) AZ 2 (2022–2022) OH 2 (2018–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check