8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McConnell, B. v. B. Braun Medical Inc.green2 sentences2026See id. at 231 (“The trial court abused its discretion … because it disregarded Pennsylvania’s interests and improperly focused on whether Philadelphia is a convenient forum.”) (emphasis in original); see also Failor, 248 A.3d at 535 (finding an “error of law if the trial court makes an analysis based on the inconvenience of one county to another state because a case’s lack of connection to one county does not justify dismissal from the entire state”) (cleaned up). 2026See id. at 231 (“The trial court abused its discretion … because it disregarded Pennsylvania’s interests and improperly focused on whether Philadelphia is a convenient forum.”) (emphasis in original); see - 20 - J-A27034-25 also Failor, 248 A.3d at 535 (finding an “error of law if the trial court makes an analysis based on the inconvenience of one county to another state because a case’s lack of connection to one county does not justify dismissal from the entire state”) (cleaned up). | 3 | 5 |
Failor, R. v. Fedex Ground Packagegreen2 sentences2026See id. at 231 (“The trial court abused its discretion … because it disregarded Pennsylvania’s interests and improperly focused on whether Philadelphia is a convenient forum.”) (emphasis in original); see also Failor, 248 A.3d at 535 (finding an “error of law if the trial court makes an analysis based on the inconvenience of one county to another state because a case’s lack of connection to one county does not justify dismissal from the entire state”) (cleaned up). 2026See id. at 231 (“The trial court abused its discretion … because it disregarded Pennsylvania’s interests and improperly focused on whether Philadelphia is a convenient forum.”) (emphasis in original); see - 20 - J-A27034-25 also Failor, 248 A.3d at 535 (finding an “error of law if the trial court makes an analysis based on the inconvenience of one county to another state because a case’s lack of connection to one county does not justify dismissal from the entire state”) (cleaned up). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bochetto v. Piper Aircraft Co.
green
2 sentences2026Although we could remand the case, as we have before, for the trial court to consider the public factors, see, e.g., Bochetto, 94 A.3d at 1056 , the record fully sets forth the public factors at issue and the evidence is not in question. 2026Although we could remand the case, as we have before, for the trial court to consider the public factors, see, e.g., Bochetto, 94 A.3d at 1056 , the record fully sets forth the public factors at issue and the evidence is not in question. | 3 | 2026–2026 |
Commonwealth v. Kirsch
green
1 sentence2016Id. at 1285 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation Center
green
2 sentences1989The trial court makes this analysis based upon its interpretation of Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation Center, 512 Pa. 60 , 515 A.2d 1350 (1986). 1989The trial court makes this analysis based upon its interpretation of Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation Center, 512 Pa. 60 , 515 A.2d 1350 (1986). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Rhodes v. Terheyden
green
1 sentence1924Under the terms of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, when the claim filed is not sufficiently specific, the appropriate remedy is a rule for a more detailed narration of facts, to be followed by a motion for non-pros if the court makes the rule absolute and its order to file a supplemental statement is not complied with: Rhodes v. Terheyden, 272 Pa. 397 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.