quantity test (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

quantity test in Pennsylvania

8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2021 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Canter v. American Honda Motor Corp.green
pa · 1967 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2007–2021
2 sentences

2021In Canter, the Supreme Court found that a company whose employees drove cars into Philadelphia “to demonstrate cars and to consummate sales” met the quality test for venue, and that the contacts also met the quantity test where one to two percent of the company’s gross sales occurred in Philadelphia. 231 A.2d at 143 .

2021Thus, the Majority renders the quantity prong largely irrelevant, as quantity seemingly always follows quality in the Majority’s view, which I view as an improper application of law. -5- J-E01001-20 defendant that conducted five to ten percent of its cab business there); Canter v. American Honda Motor Corp., 231 A.2d 140, 143 (Pa. 1967) (holding that one to two percent of a defendant’s business was sufficient to establish the quantity test described in Monaco); Zampana-Barry, 921 A.2d at 506 (three to five percent of a law firm’s legal services conducted in Philadelphia supported venue in Phil

26
Zampana-Barry v. Donaghuegreen
pasuperct · 2007 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021Thus, the Majority renders the quantity prong largely irrelevant, as quantity seemingly always follows quality in the Majority’s view, which I view as an improper application of law. -5- J-E01001-20 defendant that conducted five to ten percent of its cab business there); Canter v. American Honda Motor Corp., 231 A.2d 140, 143 (Pa. 1967) (holding that one to two percent of a defendant’s business was sufficient to establish the quantity test described in Monaco); Zampana-Barry, 921 A.2d at 506 (three to five percent of a law firm’s legal services conducted in Philadelphia supported venue in Phil

2021Thus, the Majority renders the quantity prong largely irrelevant, as quantity seemingly always follows quality in the Majority’s view, which I view as an improper application of law. -5- J-E01001-20 defendant that conducted five to ten percent of its cab business there); Canter v. American Honda Motor Corp., 231 A.2d 140, 143 (Pa. 1967) (holding that one to two percent of a defendant’s business was sufficient to establish the quantity test described in Monaco); Zampana-Barry, 921 A.2d at 506 (three to five percent of a law firm’s legal services conducted in Philadelphia supported venue in Phil

22
Battuello v. Camelback Ski Corp.green
pasuperct · 1991 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007In concluding that the quantity test was not met, the Court noted that “only five percent of Eastern’s customers are from Philadelphia” and “less than one percent of Camelback’s business consists of skiers sent by Eastern.” Id. at 1030.

2007In concluding that the quantity test was not met, the Court noted that "only five percent of Eastern's customers are from Philadelphia" and "less than one percent of Camelback's business consists of skiers sent by Eastern." Id. at 1030.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Gale v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center Eastwick, Inc. green
pasuperct · 1997
2 sentences

2002Gale, supra. (citations omitted) Acts satisfying the quantity test are those so continuous and sufficient to be general or habitual.

2002Gale, supra, (citations omitted) Acts satisfying the quantity test are those so continuous and sufficient to be general or habitual.

22002–2002

Where else courts name it

TX 11 (1937–2012) PA 8 (2002–2021) FL 6 (1998–2020) OH 3 (2019–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check