Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1954–1973 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissiongreen2 sentences1966The same proposition was advanced by the city in Pittsburgh v. Pa. P.U.C., supra, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 341, 353, 356 , 144 A. 2d 648 , and rejected by this Court, stating: “To have validity this contention must be based upon a factual finding that the excess of the book reserve over the reserve requirement was a genuine one in the sense that it had been contributed by the ratepayers over the years in addition to providing the utility with a fair return. . . . 1962Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, supra, 182 Pa. Superior Ct. 551, 558 , 128 A. 2d 372 ; Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, supra, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 341, 354 , 144 A. 2d 648 . | 1 | 3 |
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissiongreen2 sentences1958Certainly, the commission was not obliged to find that the excess of book reserve over the reserve requirement was genuine.” The subsequent rate proceeding of Manufacturers, which was before us in Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, supra, 182 Pa. Superior Ct. 551, 557, 560 , 128 A. 2d 372 , also involved the reliability of this same book reserve, for depreciation and depletion. 1958Certainly, the commission was not obliged to find that the excess of book reserve over the reserve requirement was genuine.” The subsequent rate proceeding of Manufacturers, which was before us in Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, supra, 182 Pa. Superior Ct. 551, 557, 560 , 128 A. 2d 372 , also involved the reliability of this same book reserve, for depreciation and depletion. | 1 | 3 |
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissiongreen2 sentences1973See Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 46 , 112 A. 2d 826 (1955). 1956We did not say or imply in the prior case (Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commis sion, supra, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 16, 55 , 112 A. 2d 826 ), that the affirmative burden was upon complainants to show that the excess of the book reserve over the reserve requirement was genuine, as the city contends. | 1 | 2 |
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.green2 sentences1955See Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Company, 271 U. S. 23 , 46 S. Ct. 363 , 70 L. 1955See Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Company, 271 U. S. 23 , 46 S. Ct. 363 , 70 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harrisburg Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
green
2 sentences1954In Harrisburg Steel Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , 109 A. 2d 719 , a present reserve requirement study revealed that the balance in the company’s book reserve for depreciation was $9,711,287 less than the accrued depreciation indicated by the reserve study as having actually occurred. 1954In Harrisburg Steel Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , 109 A. 2d 719 , a present reserve requirement study revealed that the balance in the company’s book reserve for depreciation was $9,711,287 less than the accrued depreciation indicated by the reserve study as having actually occurred. | 2 | 1954–1955 |
Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
green
1 sentence1956The fact that the book reserve showed a higher or lower amount than the reserve requirement study has no effect oh the principles applicable to such administrative, finding.” The city urges us to review our previous, determination of this issue because it believes that the decision of our Supremé Court'in Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 382 Pa. 622 , 116 A, 2d 738, declaring that the affirmative burden of supporting a rate increase is, by statute, on the utility, changes the legal principles which we applied in the prior case. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Fischer v. Pittsburgh
green
1 sentence1956We did not say or imply in the prior case (Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commis sion, supra, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 16, 55 , 112 A. 2d 826 ), that the affirmative burden was upon complainants to show that the excess of the book reserve over the reserve requirement was genuine, as the city contends. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
green
2 sentences1955In Duquesne Light Company v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 568 , 107 A. 2d 745 , we held that the commission, having applied the remainder life theory in a previous proceeding involving the utility, could not subsequently make a complete change of its policy to the utility’s prejudice. 1955In Duquesne Light Company v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 568 , 107 A. 2d 745 , we held that the commission, having applied the remainder life theory in a previous proceeding involving the utility, could not subsequently make a complete change of its policy to the utility’s prejudice. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.