statute conferring privilege (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

statute conferring privilege in Pennsylvania

8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1957–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & Revenuegreen
pa · 1957 · cited in 5 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1977–2019
2 sentences

2019“Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed.” Id.

1986“Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed.” Land Holding Corporation at 65 , 130 A.2d at 703 .

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine green
scotus · 1952
2 sentences

1965Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed: Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana et al., 323 U. S. 459 (1945); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner, 342 U. S. 299 (1952).

1963Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed: Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana, 323 U. S. 459 (1945); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner, 342 U. S. 299 (1952).

31957–1965
Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury green
scotus · 1945
2 sentences

1965Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed: Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana et al., 323 U. S. 459 (1945); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner, 342 U. S. 299 (1952).

1963Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege and authorizing refunds must be strictly construed and followed: Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana, 323 U. S. 459 (1945); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner, 342 U. S. 299 (1952).

31957–1965
Calvert Distillers Corp. v. Board of Finance & Revenue green
pa · 1954
2 sentences

1965Cf. Calvert Distillers Corporation v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476 , 103 A.2d 668 ; and see 49 Am.

1965Cf. Calvert Distillers Corporation v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476 , 103 A.2d 668 ; and see 49 Am.

31957–1965

Where else courts name it

PA 8 (1957–2019) NY 4 (1967–2024) MD 3 (1989–2003) CT 2 (1975–2001) OH 2 (1995–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check