Federal Constitutions bar (Rhode Island) · Go Syfert
← Rhode Island issues

Federal Constitutions bar in Rhode Island

8 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Griffithgreen
ri · 1992 · cited in 6 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1993–2016
2 sentences

2016Often, defendants move to suppress confessions that have not been recorded because “[b]oth the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” State v. Humphrey, 715 A.2d 1265, 1274 (R.I.1998) (quoting State v. Griffith, 612 A.2d 21, 25 (R.I.1992)).

2002“Both the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” State v. Marini, 638 A.2d 507, 512 (R.I.1994) (quoting State v. Griffith, 612 A.2d 21, 25 (R.I.1992)).

56
State v. Amadogreen
ri · 1981 · cited in 4 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1992–2000
2 sentences

2000“Both the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” Griffith, 612 A.2d at 25 (citing State v. Amado, 424 A.2d 1057, 1061 (R.I.1981)).

1993“Both the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” State v. Griffith, 612 A.2d 21, 25 (R.I.1992) (citing State v. Amado, 424 A.2d 1057, 1061 (R.I.1981) (citing state and federal precedent)).

34
State v. Humphreygreen
ri · 1998 · cited in 2 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 2000–2016
2 sentences

2016Often, defendants move to suppress confessions that have not been recorded because “[b]oth the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” State v. Humphrey, 715 A.2d 1265, 1274 (R.I.1998) (quoting State v. Griffith, 612 A.2d 21, 25 (R.I.1992)).

2000See State v. Humphrey, 715 A.2d 1265, 1274 (R.I.1998).

22
State v. Marinigreen
ri · 1994 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002“Both the Rhode Island and the Federal Constitutions bar the use in a criminal trial of a defendant’s involuntary statements.” State v. Marini, 638 A.2d 507, 512 (R.I.1994) (quoting State v. Griffith, 612 A.2d 21, 25 (R.I.1992)).

11
State v. Smithgreen
ri · 1992 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
1 sentence

1998In order to admit a defendant’s confession at trial, the state must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the confession was made after the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights under Miranda, State v. Smith, 602 A.2d 931, 935 (R.I.1992) (citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)), and that the confession was made voluntarily.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1998In order to admit a defendant’s confession at trial, the state must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the confession was made after the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights under Miranda, State v. Smith, 602 A.2d 931, 935 (R.I.1992) (citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)), and that the confession was made voluntarily.

1998In order to admit a defendant’s confession at trial, the state must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the confession was made after the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights under Miranda, State v. Smith, 602 A.2d 931, 935 (R.I.1992) (citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)), and that the confession was made voluntarily.

11998–1998

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check