59 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Selke v. Selkegreen2 sentences2015Id. 1994In assessing attorney's fees, the court may consider such factors as the amount of assets awarded to the parties, the relative earning ability of the parties, and which party initiated the action." Selke, supra, at 102 . | 3 | 10 |
Meade v. Levettgreen2 sentences2012Meade v. Levett, 671 N.E.2d 1172 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). 2004Meade v. Levett, 671 N.E.2d 1172, 1179 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). | 2 | 4 |
Dougherty v. Leavellgreen2 sentences2014“When determining the amount of a reasonable attorney fee, ‘the court may consider such factors as the hourly rate, the result achieved ... and the difficulty of the issues.’ ” Heiligenstein v. Matney, 691 N.E.2d 1297, 1304 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (emphasis added) (quoting Dougherty v. Leavell, 582 N.E.2d 442, 443 (Ind.Ct.App.1991)). 1998When determining the amount of a reasonable attorney fee, “the court may consider such factors as the hourly rate, the result achieved ... and.the difficulty of the issues.” Dougherty v. Leavell, 582 N.E.2d 442, 443 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). | 2 | 3 |
Riddle v. Riddlegreen2 sentences1996See Riddle v. Riddle, 566 N.E.2d 78, 83 (Ind.Ct.App.1991); Canaday v. Canaday, 467 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 1996See Riddle v. Riddle, 566 N.E.2d 78, 83 (Ind.Ct.App.1991); Canaday v. Canaday, 467 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). | 2 | 3 |
Champlain v. Stategreen2 sentences2016The trial court may consider factors such “as the defendant’s financial information, health, and employment history.” Champlain v. State, 717 N.E.2d 567, 570 (Ind. 1999). 2016The trial court may consider factors such “as the defendant’s financial information, health, and employment history.” Champlain v. State, 717 N.E.2d 567, 570 (Ind.1999). | 2 | 2 |
In re Marriage of Bartleygreen2 sentences2018Id. 2015In awarding attorney fees, “the court may consider such factors as the resources of the parties, the relative earning ability of the parties, and other factors which bear on the reasonableness of the award.” In re Marriage of Bartley, 712 N.E.2d 537, 546 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). | 1 | 5 |
Canaday v. Canadaygreen2 sentences1996See Riddle v. Riddle, 566 N.E.2d 78, 83 (Ind.Ct.App.1991); Canaday v. Canaday, 467 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 1996See Riddle v. Riddle, 566 N.E.2d 78, 83 (Ind.Ct.App.1991); Canaday v. Canaday, 467 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 3 |
Olcott International & Co. v. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.green2 sentences2025Id. (citing Olcott Int’l & Co. v. Micro Data Base Sys., 793 N.E.2d 1063, 1079 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003), trans. denied); see also Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(a). 2006Id. | 1 | 2 |
Gilbert v. Gilbertgreen2 sentences2017Id. [14] In assessing attorney fees, the court may consider such factors as the resources of the parties, the relative earning ability of the parties, and other factors that bear on the reasonableness of the award. 2016Gilbert v. Gilbert, 777 N.E.2d 785, 795 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). | 1 | 2 |
Lisa B. Gonzalez v. R. Stanton Evansgreen1 sentence2018Although that was indeed the type of information sought in Gonzalez , as well as in the IBM case upon which Gonzalez relied, we also stated that attorney consultation by a nonparty was permissible "to determine whether there is any legal basis to object to the subpoena." Gonzalez , 15 N.E.3d at 637 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Julie D. Himes v. Todd A. Himes (mem. dec.)green1 sentence2017Himes v. Himes, 57 N.E.3d 820, 830 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Amanda Dillon v. Matthew Dillongreen1 sentence2016Dillon v. Dillon, 42 N.E.3d 165, 168 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). 9 Thus, the trial court did not simply state that the GAL “testified” that Father would foster a more supportive environment than Mother, as Mother claims in her brief. | 1 | 1 |
Heiligenstein v. Matneygreen1 sentence2014“When determining the amount of a reasonable attorney fee, ‘the court may consider such factors as the hourly rate, the result achieved ... and the difficulty of the issues.’ ” Heiligenstein v. Matney, 691 N.E.2d 1297, 1304 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (emphasis added) (quoting Dougherty v. Leavell, 582 N.E.2d 442, 443 (Ind.Ct.App.1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Farthing v. Farthinggreen2 sentences2014Farthing v. Farthing, 178 Ind. App. 336, 341 , 382 N.E.2d 941, 945 (1978). 2014Farthing v. Farthing, 178 Ind. App. 336, 341 , 382 N.E.2d 941, 945 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning Appealsgreen2 sentences2012In City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 152 Ind. App. 480, 486 , 284 N.E.2d 119, 124 (1972), we held an attack on a court’s jurisdiction is not a decision on the merits, but instead determines only whether the court may consider the claim. 2012In City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 152 Ind. App. 480, 486 , 284 N.E.2d 119, 124 (1972), we held an attack on a court’s jurisdiction is not a decision on the merits, but instead determines only whether the court may consider the claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Gordon v. Purdue Universitygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin Richard Himsel, Janet Himsel, Robert Lannon, and Susan Lannon v. Indiana Pork Producers Association and Livestock Engineering Solutions
green
2 sentences2020“In addition, a court may consider the factors listed in Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(a) governing the reasonableness of a fee for disciplinary purposes, but it is not required to expressly do so.” Id. at 113-14 . [31] At the hearing on Attorney York’s petition for appellate attorney fees, Attorney York presented evidence that he spent 453.20 hours addressing appellate issues. 2020“In addition, a court may consider the factors listed in Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(a) governing the reasonableness of a fee for disciplinary purposes, but it is not required to expressly do so.” Id. at 113-14 . [35] Smarte Carte first argues that the fees incurred prior to July 2012, when the “issue of separate counsel was apparently first asserted”; and the fees incurred prior to December 2012, when Smarte Carte filed an answer to the cross-claim, should have been excluded. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Ratliff v. Ratliff
green
2 sentences2014“When determining whether an award of attorney fees is appropriate, the court may consider such factors as the resources of the parties, the relative earning ability of the parties, and other factors that bear on the reasonableness of the award.” Id. 2006"When determining whether an award of attorney fees is appropriate, the court may consider such factors as the resources of the parties, the relative earning ability of the parties, and other factors that bear on the reasonableness of the award." Id. | 2 | 2006–2014 |
Bower v. Bower
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2002Id. | 2 | 2002–2008 |
Marriage of Collier v. Collier
green
2 sentences2000Id. 2000Id. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
In re the Marriage of Tearman
green
2 sentences1998Id. 1998Id. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Page v. State
green
2 sentences1981The court shall make a record of the hearing, including: (1) a transcript of the hearing; (2) a copy of the presentence report; and (3) if the court finds aggravating circumstances or mitigating circumstances, a statement of the court's reasons for selecting the sentence that it imposes.” (Emphasis added.) Furthermore, we note, under Ind.Code 353-4.1-4-7(c), (d), factors which the court may consider as aggravating circumstances; the statute provides: “(c) The court may consider these factors as aggravating circumstances or as favoring imposing consecutive terms of imprisonment: (1) The person 1981The court shall make a record of the hearing, including: (1) a transcript of the hearing; (2) a copy of the presentence report; and (3) if the court finds aggravating circumstances or mitigating circumstances, a statement of the court’s reasons for selecting the sentence that it imposes.’ (Emphasis added.) Furthermore; we note, under Ind.Code 35-4.1—4-7(c), (d), factors which the court may consider as aggravating circumstances; the statutes provide: ‘(c) The court may consider these factors as aggravating circumstances or as favoring imposing consecutive terms of imprisonment: (1) The person h | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Dempsey v. Carter
green
1 sentence2025Id. (citing Olcott Int’l & Co. v. Micro Data Base Sys., 793 N.E.2d 1063, 1079 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003), trans. denied); see also Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(a). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Dana Companies v. Chaffee Rentals
green
1 sentence2024Id. [17] Indiana Code Section 31-17-2.2-2 provides: (a) If a party provides notice of relocation at an initial hearing to determine custody, the court may consider the factors set forth in this chapter in the court’s initial custody determination. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sabo v. Sabo
green
1 sentence2018Sabo v. Sabo , 858 N.E.2d 1064 , 1068 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). [17] Further, INDIANA CODE § 31-17-2.2-2(a) provides that "if a party provides notice of relocation at an initial hearing to determine custody, the court may consider the factors set forth in this chapter in the court's initial custody determination." Those relocation factors are as follows: (1) The distance involved in the proposed change of residence. (2) The hardship and expense involved for the nonrelocating individual to exercise parenting time or grandparent visitation. (3) The feasibility of preserving the relationship between | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Uthman Cavallo, M.D. v. Allied Physicians of Michiana, LLC
green
1 sentence2018In addition, a court may consider the factors listed in Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(a) governing the reasonableness of a fee for disciplinary purposes, but it is not required *114 to expressly do so. 7 Id. at 1009-10 . [31] We first reject the Plaintiffs' suggestion that under Trial Rule 34(C)(3) and Gonzalez , a nonparty is only entitled to attorney fees with respect to evaluating whether a subpoena is seeking confidential or otherwise sensitive information. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
McGuire v. McGuire
green
1 sentence2018McGuire v. McGuire , 880 N.E.2d 297 , 303 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Cynthia Bell v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2017“The trial court may consider factors such ‘as the defendant’s financial information, health, and employment history.’” Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
John Luttrell v. Melinda Luttrell
green
1 sentence2015Id. [45] In this case, the trial court noted in its dissolution decree that, with respect to an award of attorney’s fees, “Husband earns significantly more than the Wife.” Appellant’s App. p. 118. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Quillen v. Quillen
green
1 sentence2014Quillen, 671 N.E.2d at 103 (quoting Selke v. Selke, 600 N.E.2d 100, 102 (Ind.1992)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Anglemyer v. State
green
1 sentence2013The court stated that "[elven if it was at the consent and urging of somebody else, he was aware of what the law was and the possible ramifications of speeding." Id. at 623 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Matter of Buker neutral | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Skinner v. Skinner green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Warfield v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| General Grain, Inc. v. Goodrich green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Page v. State green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Inman v. State green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.