Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1987–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hendrickson v. State Bd. of Medicinegreen2 sentences1991The lower court’s authority for this determination was Hendrickson v. State Board of Medicine, 108 Pa. Commwlth.Ct. 124, 130, 529 A.2d 78, 81 (1987), which stated: This court may consider a claim of abuse of discretion by an administrative agency and may modify the order if the penalty is unduly harsh____ In doing so, we are limited to determining whether the penalty is reasonable in light of the violation. 124 Pa.Cmwlth. at 484 , 556 A.2d at 526 . 1989In doing so, we are limited to determining whether the penalty is reasonable in light of the violation.” Hendrickson v. State Board of Medicine, 108 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 124, 130 , 529 A.2d 78, 81 (1987) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Simpsongreen1 sentence2022Commonwealth v. Simpson, 829 A.2d 334, 339 (Pa. Super. 2003) (emphasis added) (stating that, a trial court may consider factors already included in the guidelines if “they are used to supplement other extraneous sentencing information”). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Robertsgreen1 sentence2020See Roberts, supra. Trooper Fachet commented upon the significant quantity of cocaine found in the toilet bowl, the way in which it was packaged, and the paraphernalia located in the kitchen as evincing an intent to sell the drugs. | 1 | 1 |
Fessler v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.green1 sentence2019See Fessler v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc., 131 A.3d 44, 52 (Pa. Super. 2015); Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc., 754 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa. Super. 2000). -8- J-S71032-18 As to the timing of a petition to transfer venue, “Rule 1006(d) imposes no time limit upon a party who seeks to transfer venue[.]” Wood v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 829 A.2d 707, 710 (Pa. Super. 2003) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Wood v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.green1 sentence2019See Fessler v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc., 131 A.3d 44, 52 (Pa. Super. 2015); Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc., 754 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa. Super. 2000). -8- J-S71032-18 As to the timing of a petition to transfer venue, “Rule 1006(d) imposes no time limit upon a party who seeks to transfer venue[.]” Wood v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 829 A.2d 707, 710 (Pa. Super. 2003) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc.green1 sentence2019See Fessler v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc., 131 A.3d 44, 52 (Pa. Super. 2015); Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc., 754 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa. Super. 2000). -8- J-S71032-18 As to the timing of a petition to transfer venue, “Rule 1006(d) imposes no time limit upon a party who seeks to transfer venue[.]” Wood v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 829 A.2d 707, 710 (Pa. Super. 2003) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen1 sentence2017To prove unnecessary hardship in a dimensional variance case, the court may consider factors “including the economic detriment to the applicant if the variance was denied, the financial hardship created by any work necessary to bring the [property] into strict compliance with the zoning requirements and the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood.”5 Hertzberg v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 721 A.2d 43, 50 (Pa. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
Ken-Med Associates v. Board of Township Supervisorsgreen1 sentence2017However, even in a dimensional variance case, a variance is not warranted where the hardship is related to the landowner’s desired use of the land, rather than the land itself, Yeager v. Zoning Hearing Board of City of Allentown, 779 A.2d 595, 598 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001), or the hardship is self-inflicted, Ken-Med Associates v. Board of Township Supervisors of Kennedy Township, 900 A.2d 460, 466 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Yeager v. Zoning Hearing Boardgreen1 sentence2017However, even in a dimensional variance case, a variance is not warranted where the hardship is related to the landowner’s desired use of the land, rather than the land itself, Yeager v. Zoning Hearing Board of City of Allentown, 779 A.2d 595, 598 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001), or the hardship is self-inflicted, Ken-Med Associates v. Board of Township Supervisors of Kennedy Township, 900 A.2d 460, 466 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Nuttall v. Nuttallgreen2 sentences2006See Nuttall v. Nuttall, 386 Pa. Super. 148, 162-63 , 562 A.2d 841, 848 (1989). 2006See Nuttall v. Nuttall, 386 Pa. Super. 148, 162-63 , 562 A.2d 841, 848 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kobylski v. COM., MILK MKT. BOARD
green
2 sentences1987Kobylski v. Milk Marketing Board, 101 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 155 , 516 A.2d 75 (1986). 1987Kobylski v. Milk Marketing Board, 101 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 155 , 516 A.2d 75 (1986). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Commonwealth v. Halstead
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 1247 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Commonwealth v. Berry
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Commonwealth v. Coaxum
green
1 sentence2016Baldwin. 58 A.3d at 763 -64. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Commonwealth v. Ratsamy
green
1 sentence2014Ratsamy, 934 A.2d at 1237 1238. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Slawek v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1991The lower court’s authority for this determination was Hendrickson v. State Board of Medicine, 108 Pa. Commwlth.Ct. 124, 130, 529 A.2d 78, 81 (1987), which stated: This court may consider a claim of abuse of discretion by an administrative agency and may modify the order if the penalty is unduly harsh____ In doing so, we are limited to determining whether the penalty is reasonable in light of the violation. 124 Pa.Cmwlth. at 484 , 556 A.2d at 526 . 1991The lower court’s authority for this determination was Hendrickson v. State Board of Medicine, 108 Pa. Commwlth.Ct. 124, 130, 529 A.2d 78, 81 (1987), which stated: This court may consider a claim of abuse of discretion by an administrative agency and may modify the order if the penalty is unduly harsh____ In doing so, we are limited to determining whether the penalty is reasonable in light of the violation. 124 Pa.Cmwlth. at 484 , 556 A.2d at 526 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.