Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Totty v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2007We have likewise rejected expert testimony based on a state-wide standard of professional practice, Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676, 678-79 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003); Tilley, 2002 WL 1000196 , at *4 (holding that the relevant standard of professional practice is not a nationwide or even a statewide standard of care), as well as testimony premised on a regional standard of professional practice. 2005We have likewise rejected expert testimony based on a state-wide standard of professional practice, Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676, 678-79 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003); Tilley v. Bindra, No. W2001-01157-COA-R3-CV, 2002 WL 1000196 , at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 13, 2002) (holding that the relevant standard of professional practice is not a nationwide or even a statewide standard of care), as well as testimony premised on a regional standard of professional practice. | 2 | 2 |
Brett v. Berkowitzgreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del. 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 2 | 2 |
Chapman v. Bearfieldgreen2 sentences2017By extension, an expert who opines in a legal malpractice case about an attorney’s adherence to our professional standard of care must be familiar with the statewide professional standard of care.” 207 S.W.3d 736, 740 (Tenn. 2006). 7 719 S.W.2d 535, 540 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986), abrogated on other grounds by Chapman v. Bearfield, 207 S.W.3d 736 (Tenn. 2006) (citations omitted). 2017By extension, an expert who opines in a legal malpractice case about an attorney’s adherence to our professional standard of care must be familiar with the statewide professional standard of care.” 207 S.W.3d 736, 740 (Tenn. 2006). 7 719 S.W.2d 535, 540 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986), abrogated on other grounds by Chapman v. Bearfield, 207 S.W.3d 736 (Tenn. 2006) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Cleckner v. Dalegreen1 sentence2017By extension, an expert who opines in a legal malpractice case about an attorney’s adherence to our professional standard of care must be familiar with the statewide professional standard of care.” 207 S.W.3d 736, 740 (Tenn. 2006). 7 719 S.W.2d 535, 540 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986), abrogated on other grounds by Chapman v. Bearfield, 207 S.W.3d 736 (Tenn. 2006) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Fenaille & Despeaux v. Coudertgreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Russo v. Griffingreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Kellos v. Sawilowskygreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Haynsworthgreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Little v. Matthewsongreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Feil v. Wishekgreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausinggreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, 2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Lubnaugreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kenyon v. Handal
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010Id. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Little v. Matthewson
neutral
1 sentence2006See, e.g., Brett v. Berkowitz, 706 A.2d 509, 517 (Del.Super.Ct.1998); Kellos v. Sawilowsky, 254 Ga. 4 , 325 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1985); Fenaille v. Coudert, 44 N.J.L. 286, 289 (N.J.1882); Little v. Matthewson, 114 N.C.App. 562 , 442 S.E.2d 567, 570 (1994), aff'd 340 N.G. 102, 455 S.E.2d 160 (1995); Feil v. Wishek, 193 N.W.2d 218, 225 (N.D.1971); Smith v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Geurard, 322 S.C. 433 , 472 S.E.2d 612, 614 (1954); Russo v. Griffin, 147 Vt. 20 , 510 A.2d 436, 438 (1986); Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. Clausing, 73 Wash.2d 393 , 438 P.2d 865, 866 (1975); Moore v. Lubnau, 855 P.2d 1245, | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Stanley v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1999In Davis-Kidd, the court found that geographical distinctions for determining whether material is offensive by community standards have been allowed by the United States Supreme Court and that the high court has allowed the states wide latitude in defining “community.” The reasoning of Davis-Kidd leads to a conclusion that equal protection is not trampled by a definition of “community” as the judicial district in which the crime is alleged to have occurred, rather than a statewide standard. 3 *397 The defendants raise two su-bissues in which they contend that the federal and state decisions wh 1999In Davis-Kidd, the court found that geographical distinctions for determining whether material is offensive by community standards have been allowed by the United States Supreme Court and that the high court has allowed the states wide latitude in defining “community.” The reasoning of Davis-Kidd leads to a conclusion that equal protection is not trampled by a definition of “community” as the judicial district in which the crime is alleged to have occurred, rather than a statewide standard. 3 *397 The defendants raise two su-bissues in which they contend that the federal and state decisions wh | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.