act contributing claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

act contributing claim in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Antonius v. King Countygreen
wash · 2004 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2006–2008
2 sentences

2008It held that "`[p]rovided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability.'" Antonius, 153 Wash.2d at 264 , 103 P.3d 729 (alteration in original) (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 117 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 ).

2008It held that “ ‘[p]rovided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability.’ ” Antonius, 153 Wn.2d at 264 (alteration in original) (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 117 ).

24
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgangreen
scotus · 2002 · cited in 7 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2026
2 sentences

2026The jury was correctly instructed that they may “consider conduct occurring prior to July 17, 2020, only if it is part of the same hostile work environment as at least one act that took place after July 17, 2020.” See Morgan, 536 U.S. at 115 (“Provided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability.”).

2008It held that “ ‘[p]rovided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability.’ ” Antonius, 153 Wn.2d at 264 (alteration in original) (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 117 ).

17

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Antonius v. King County green
wash · 2005
2 sentences

2008It held that "`[p]rovided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability.'" Antonius, 153 Wash.2d at 264 , 103 P.3d 729 (alteration in original) (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 117 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 ).

2006It held that "[p]rovided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period, the entire time period of the hostile environment may be considered by a court for the purposes of determining liability." Antonius, 153 Wash.2d at 264 , 103 P.3d 729 (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 117 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 ). ¶ 62 Here, Clarke's last day of work at the Tacoma AGO was January 24, 2001, when she was reassigned to home.

22006–2008
Clarke v. Office of the Attorney General green
washctapp · 2006
2 sentences

2008Clarke v. State Attorney General's Office, 133 Wash.App. 767, 785-86 , 138 P.3d 144 (2006).

2008Clarke v. Office of Attorney Gen., 133 Wn.

22008–2008
Clarke v. STATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE green
washctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2008Clarke v. State Attorney General's Office, 133 Wash.App. 767, 785-86 , 138 P.3d 144 (2006).

12008–2008

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.030 (6) USC § 42u.s.c.2000e-5(e)(1) (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.16.080 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.180 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 8 (2004–2026) TX 7 (2008–2024) NJ 4 (2002–2006) IL 3 (2009–2011) ME 2 (2005–2022) DC 2 (2003–2006) IN 2 (2003–2004) WI 2 (2007–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check