Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Department of Social & Health Services v. Chaffin
green
2 sentences2017In re Dependency of A.G., 123 Wn. 2017In re Dependency of A.C., 123 Wn. | 7 | 2015–2017 |
In Re KR
green
2 sentences2014App. at 27 (citing In re Dependency of K.R., 128 Wn.2d 129, 144 , 904 P.2d 1132 (1995)). 22 XR, 108 Wn. 2014App. at 27 (citing In re Dependency of K.R., 128 Wn.2d 129, 144 , 904 P.2d 1132 (1995)). 22 XR, 108 Wn. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Department of Social & Health Services v. Rhyne
green
1 sentence2014App. at 27 (citing In re Dependency of K.R., 128 Wn.2d 129, 144 , 904 P.2d 1132 (1995)). 22 XR, 108 Wn. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In re the Welfare of M.R.H.
green
1 sentence2014App. at 164 ). 20 See RCW 13.34.180(e). -11- No. 71223-3-1/12 RCW 13.34.180(e) "is whether the identified deficiencies have been corrected."21 If the deficiencies have not been corrected, termination of parental rights is still appropriate if the services would not have remedied the parent's deficiencies in the foreseeable future.22 Although the law provides no numerical standard to measure the foreseeable future, this determination is a factual inquiry evaluated from "the child's point of view,"23 which varies with the child's age.24 For young children, the foreseeable future may mean a matte | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.