Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gonzales v. Department of Licensinggreen2 sentences2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . 2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . | 3 | 6 |
State v. Storhoffgreen2 sentences2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w 1998The result of the breath test will be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, id. at 898 , and (2) the driver demonstrates that he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning, State v. Storhoff, 133 Wn.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997) (overruling City of Spokane v. Holmberg, 50 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Storhoffgreen2 sentences2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w 1998The result of the breath test will be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, id. at 898 , and (2) the driver demonstrates that he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning, State v. Storhoff, 133 Wn.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997) (overruling City of Spokane v. Holmberg, 50 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Trevinogreen2 sentences2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w 2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grewal v. Department of Licensing
green
2 sentences2011App. at 731 . ¶12 “The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportu nity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning.” Grewal v. Dep’t of Licensing, 108 Wn. 2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
STATE DEPT. OF LICENSING v. Grewal
green
2 sentences2011App. 815 , 822, 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wn.2d at 902 . 2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Bartels
green
2 sentences2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w 2001See also State v. Trevino, 127 Wash.2d 735, 747 , 903 P.2d 447 (1995). [17] Gonzales v. Department of Licensing, 112 Wash.2d 890, 898 , 774 P.2d 1187 (1989). [18] State v. Storhoff, 133 Wash.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997); State v. Bartels, 112 Wash.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 . [19] See Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 901 , 774 P.2d 1187 (where the arresting officer gave all the required implied consent warnings, but they contained additional language which, under certain circumstances was inaccurate, the driver must demonstrate that he w | 2 | 1998–2001 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2019Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 , 96 S. Ct. 893 , 47 L. 2019Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 , 96 S. Ct. 893 , 47 L. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Jury v. State, Dept. of Licensing
green
1 sentence2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jury v. Department of Licensing
neutral
1 sentence2011"The warnings must permit someone of normal intelligence to understand the consequences of his or her actions." Jury, 114 Wash.App. at 731 , 60 P.3d 615 . ¶ 12 "The result of a breath test must be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, and (2) the driver demonstrates that [s]he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning." Dep't of Licensing v. Grewal, 108 Wash.App. 815, 822 , 33 P.3d 94 (2001) (footnote omitted); see also Gonzales, 112 Wash.2d at 902 , 774 P.2d 1187 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
City of Spokane v. Holmberg
green
2 sentences1998The result of the breath test will be suppressed if (1) the inaccurate warning deprives the driver of the opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision, id. at 898 , and (2) the driver demonstrates that he was actually prejudiced by the inaccurate warning, State v. Storhoff, 133 Wn.2d 523, 531-32 , 946 P.2d 783 (1997) (overruling City of Spokane v. Holmberg, 50 Wn. 1998App. 317, 323-24 , 745 P.2d 49 (1987) (holding that implied consent statute requires strict compliance and no showing of prejudice)); State v. Bartels, 112 Wn.2d 882, 889-90 , 774 P.2d 1183 (1989); Gonzales, 112 Wn.2d at 899 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cooper v. Department of Licensing
green
1 sentence1993Cooper v. Department of Licensing, 61 Wn. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.