Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2021State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 307 , 165 P.3d 1241 (2007); In re Pers. 2016State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 307 , 165 P.3d 1241 (2007); In re Pers. | 5 | 2016–2021 |
State v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2021State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 307 , 165 P.3d 1241 (2007); In re Pers. 2016State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 307 , 165 P.3d 1241 (2007); In re Pers. | 5 | 2016–2021 |
Prybysz v. City of Spokane
neutral
2 sentences2002In Prybysz , the plaintiff specifically contended that the adoption of comparative negligence rendered a jury instruction expressing the duty with the disputed language "out of date." The Prybysz court rejected this contention and concluded, "[s]ince no negligence was found on the part of the City, potential errors relating to comparative negligence are moot." Prybysz, 24 Wash.App. at 460 , 601 P.2d 1297 . 2002In Prybysz , the plaintiff specifically contended that the adoption of comparative negligence rendered a jury instruction expressing the duty with the disputed language “out of date.” The Prybysz court rejected this contention and concluded, “[s]ince no negligence was found on the part of the City, potential errors relating to comparative negligence are moot.” Prybysz, 24 Wn. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Hegney
green
1 sentence2012Restraint of Hegney, 138 Wn. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.