Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haslund v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2016It has long been the rule in Washington that "'insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and con-ect errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials.'" State v. Boast, 87 Wn.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Has lund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)). 2016It has long been the rule in Washington that "'insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and con-ect errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials.'" State v. Boast, 87 Wn.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Has lund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)). | 8 | 1976–2016 |
State v. Boast
green
2 sentences2016It has long been the rule in Washington that "'insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and con-ect errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials.'" State v. Boast, 87 Wn.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Has lund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)). 2016It has long been the rule in Washington that "'insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and con-ect errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials.'" State v. Boast, 87 Wn.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Has lund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wn.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976)). | 5 | 1999–2016 |
Presnell v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences1999We explained this policy in State v. Boast, 87 Wash.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Haslund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wash.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976), and Presnell v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 60 Wash.2d 671, 675 , 374 P.2d 939 (1962)), holding: "insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and correct errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials." With regard to objections to evidence, it has long been the rule in this jurisdiction that 1999We explained this policy in State v. Boast, 87 Wash.2d 447, 451 , 553 P.2d 1322 (1976) (quoting Haslund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wash.2d 607, 614 , 547 P.2d 1221 (1976), and Presnell v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 60 Wash.2d 671, 675 , 374 P.2d 939 (1962)), holding: "insofar as possible, there shall be one trial on the merits with all issues fully and fairly presented to the trial court at that time so the court may accurately rule on all issues involved and correct errors in time to avoid unnecessary retrials." With regard to objections to evidence, it has long been the rule in this jurisdiction that | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Trueax v. Ernst Home Center, Inc.
green
2 sentences1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic 1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Wixon
green
2 sentences1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic 1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Mail
green
2 sentences1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic 1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Preer v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Barkley v. Fulcomer
green
1 sentence1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Halter v. Secretary of the Treasury
green
1 sentence1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Guloy
green
2 sentences1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic 1999"Objections must be accompanied by a reasonably definite statement of the grounds therefor so that the judge may understand the question raised and the adversary may be afforded an opportunity to remedy the claimed defect." (Citations omitted.) See also Trueax v. Ernst Home Ctr., Inc., 124 Wash.2d 334, 339 , 878 P.2d 1208 (1994) (if an exception is inadequate to apprise the judge of certain points of law, those points will not be considered on appeal); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63, 78 , 631 P.2d 1033 , review denied, 96 Wash.2d 1012 (1981) (where review of record of murder prosecution indic | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.