Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re the Personal Restraint of Huy Khac Trangreen1 sentence2015There the court concluded that because first degree assault, even when committed with a firearm, does not completely overlap the more limited instances of first degree assault subject to the minimum term requirement, the Department of Corrections erred in making its own finding and imposing the minimum term. 154 Wn.2d at 332. ¶37 This court revisited Tran in McChristian. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Personal Restraint of Cashaw
green
2 sentences2021Restraint of Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d 138, 143 , 866 P.2d 8 (1994). 2018Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274, 285 , 189 P.3d 759 (2008)(Dyer II). "[A]n inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the [1SRB]set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation." Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d at 140 . | 3 | 2014–2021 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Dyer
green
2 sentences2021Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274, 285 , 189 P.3d 759 (2008) (Dyer II). “[A]n inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the [ISRB] set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation.” In re Pers. 2018Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274, 285 , 189 P.3d 759 (2008)(Dyer II). "[A]n inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the [1SRB]set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation." Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d at 140 . | 2 | 2018–2021 |
In Re Personal Restraint of Dyer
green
2 sentences2021Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274, 285 , 189 P.3d 759 (2008) (Dyer II). “[A]n inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the [ISRB] set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation.” In re Pers. 2018Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274, 285 , 189 P.3d 759 (2008)(Dyer II). "[A]n inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the [1SRB]set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation." Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d at 140 . | 2 | 2018–2021 |
State v. Manussier
green
2 sentences2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wash.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wash.2d at 171-72 , 839 P.2d 890 . ¶ 14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen's argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. 2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wn.2d at 171-72 . ¶14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen’s argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Manussier
green
2 sentences2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wash.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wash.2d at 171-72 , 839 P.2d 890 . ¶ 14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen's argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. 2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wn.2d at 171-72 . ¶14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen’s argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Coria
green
2 sentences2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wash.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wash.2d at 171-72 , 839 P.2d 890 . ¶ 14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen's argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. 2006State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 673 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996); Coria, 120 Wn.2d at 171-72 . ¶14 We disagree with Mr. Linssen’s argument that he has a fundamental right to the opportunity to serve the minimum term of the standard range. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Sinka
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 556 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. McChristian
neutral
1 sentence2015Division Two began its analysis of the issue by agreeing with the defendant that the minimum term statute required “a factual finding that a defendant meets the requirements of the statute before a trial court may impose a mandatory minimum sentence.” McChristian, 158 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Locklear
green
2 sentences1994Nevertheless, even though Cashaw cannot establish a constitutional violation, pursuant to In re Locklear, 118 Wn.2d 409 , 823 P.2d 1078 (1992), an inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the Board set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation. 1994Nevertheless, even though Cashaw cannot establish a constitutional violation, pursuant to In re Locklear, 118 Wn.2d 409 , 823 P.2d 1078 (1992), an inmate may be entitled to relief solely upon showing the Board set a minimum term in violation of a statute or regulation. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.