time for filing claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

time for filing claim in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Anderson v. Taylor green
wash · 1959
2 sentences

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

21969–1987
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence green
wash · 1964
2 sentences

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

21969–1987
Swensson v. Carlton neutral
wash · 1943
2 sentences

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)).

21969–1987
Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District green
wash · 2016
1 sentence

2018Id.

12018–2018
Tobin v. Worden neutral
washctapp · 2010
1 sentence

2013App. 507 , 233 P.3d 906 (2010).

12013–2013
Tobin v. Worden green
washctapp · 2010
1 sentence

2013It would also be absurd to conclude that the legislature intended to create a more lenient statute of limitations for one category of PRA requests in light of its 2005 deliberate and significant shortening of the time for filing a claim from five years, under the old public disclosure act, 16 to one year, under the PRA. 17 ¶31 Division One of this court faced a similar fact pattern in Tobin v. Worden, 156 Wn.

12013–2013
Young v. City of Seattle green
wash · 1948
2 sentences

1981The Campbells further argue that pursuant to Young v. Seattle, 30 Wn.2d 357 , 191 P.2d 273 , 3 A.L.R.2d 704 (1948), they are entitled to toll the operation of the statute of limitation during certain time periods including the time for filing a claim, the additional period during which the board may consider the claim, and the period after that consideration during which the claimant must commence an action.

1981The Campbells further argue that pursuant to Young v. Seattle, 30 Wn.2d 357 , 191 P.2d 273 , 3 A.L.R.2d 704 (1948), they are entitled to toll the operation of the statute of limitation during certain time periods including the time for filing a claim, the additional period during which the board may consider the claim, and the period after that consideration during which the claimant must commence an action.

11981–1981
Stolp v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1926
2 sentences

1932In the case of Stolp v. Department of Labor and Industries, 138 Wash. 685 , 245 Pac. 20 , it was held, under Eem.

1932In the case of Stolp v. Department of Labor and Industries, 138 Wash. 685 , 245 Pac. 20 , it was held, under Eem.

11932–1932
Blackwell v. City of Seattle neutral
wash · 1917
2 sentences

1927In Blackwell v. Seattle, 97 Wash. 679 , 167 Pac. 53 , it was held that the wife may make and file a claim for personal injuries against a city in her own name, where the husband and wife are living separate and apart, and the husband was out of the state at the time and did not return until after the time for filing the claim had expired.

1927In Blackwell v. Seattle, 97 Wash. 679 , 167 Pac. 53 , it was held that the wife may make and file a claim for personal injuries against a city in her own name, where the husband and wife are living separate and apart, and the husband was out of the state at the time and did not return until after the time for filing the claim had expired.

11927–1927
Conlee v. Clark neutral
indctapp · 1896
2 sentences

1911As was said in Conlee v. Clarh, 14 Ind. App. 205 , 42 N. E. 762 , 56 Am.

1911As was said in Conlee v. Clarh, 14 Ind. App. 205 , 42 N. E. 762 , 56 Am.

11911–1911

Where else courts name it

FL 34 (1955–2023) PA 24 (1913–2023) CA 16 (1914–2020) GA 14 (1939–2020) WA 8 (1911–2018) AR 7 (1954–2015) NY 7 (1935–2005) NC 5 (1983–2005) IL 5 (1922–2025) TX 5 (1953–2020) MI 4 (1980–1993) NM 4 (1956–2017) IA 4 (1962–2008) AZ 4 (1966–2015) MA 4 (1926–2021) MO 4 (1958–1980) KS 4 (1934–1992) OR 4 (1976–1986) NJ 4 (1996–2005) MD 3 (1959–1997) NE 3 (1929–2021) OK 3 (1941–2015) OH 3 (1999–2019) MT 3 (1945–1990) AL 3 (1965–2016) MS 2 (1959–2018) CO 2 (1974–1986) RI 2 (1970–1982) UT 2 (1936–2006) WY 2 (1990–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check