8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). 1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). | 2 | 1969–1987 |
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence
green
2 sentences1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). 1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). | 2 | 1969–1987 |
Swensson v. Carlton
neutral
2 sentences1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). 1987Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence, 64 Wn.2d 798, 801 , 394 P.2d 359 (1964); Anderson v. Taylor, 55 Wn.2d 215, 217 , 347 P.2d 536 , 78 *515 A.L.R.2d 1161 (1959) (quoting Swensson v. Carlton, 17 Wn.2d 396, 405 , 135 P.2d 450 (1943)). | 2 | 1969–1987 |
Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District
green
1 sentence2018Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Tobin v. Worden
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 507 , 233 P.3d 906 (2010). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Tobin v. Worden
green
1 sentence2013It would also be absurd to conclude that the legislature intended to create a more lenient statute of limitations for one category of PRA requests in light of its 2005 deliberate and significant shortening of the time for filing a claim from five years, under the old public disclosure act, 16 to one year, under the PRA. 17 ¶31 Division One of this court faced a similar fact pattern in Tobin v. Worden, 156 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Young v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences1981The Campbells further argue that pursuant to Young v. Seattle, 30 Wn.2d 357 , 191 P.2d 273 , 3 A.L.R.2d 704 (1948), they are entitled to toll the operation of the statute of limitation during certain time periods including the time for filing a claim, the additional period during which the board may consider the claim, and the period after that consideration during which the claimant must commence an action. 1981The Campbells further argue that pursuant to Young v. Seattle, 30 Wn.2d 357 , 191 P.2d 273 , 3 A.L.R.2d 704 (1948), they are entitled to toll the operation of the statute of limitation during certain time periods including the time for filing a claim, the additional period during which the board may consider the claim, and the period after that consideration during which the claimant must commence an action. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Stolp v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences1932In the case of Stolp v. Department of Labor and Industries, 138 Wash. 685 , 245 Pac. 20 , it was held, under Eem. 1932In the case of Stolp v. Department of Labor and Industries, 138 Wash. 685 , 245 Pac. 20 , it was held, under Eem. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Blackwell v. City of Seattle
neutral
2 sentences1927In Blackwell v. Seattle, 97 Wash. 679 , 167 Pac. 53 , it was held that the wife may make and file a claim for personal injuries against a city in her own name, where the husband and wife are living separate and apart, and the husband was out of the state at the time and did not return until after the time for filing the claim had expired. 1927In Blackwell v. Seattle, 97 Wash. 679 , 167 Pac. 53 , it was held that the wife may make and file a claim for personal injuries against a city in her own name, where the husband and wife are living separate and apart, and the husband was out of the state at the time and did not return until after the time for filing the claim had expired. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Conlee v. Clark
neutral
2 sentences1911As was said in Conlee v. Clarh, 14 Ind. App. 205 , 42 N. E. 762 , 56 Am. 1911As was said in Conlee v. Clarh, 14 Ind. App. 205 , 42 N. E. 762 , 56 Am. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.