Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Interest of Tiffany Marie S.green2 sentences2019Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W. 2014Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) ( “[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.” (citation omitted)); Shamblin v. Nationwide Mut. | 7 | 7 |
Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co.green2 sentences2019Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W. 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. Bechtoldgreen2 sentences2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 1 | 2 |
Maples v. West Virginia Department of Commercegreen2 sentences2014See also Syl. pt. 1, Maples v. West Virginia Dep’t of Commerce, 197 W.Va. 318 , 475 S.E.2d 410 (1996) (“A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error, and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.” (citation omitted)); Shamblin v. Nationwide Mut. 2014See also Syl. pt. 1, Maples v. West Virginia Dep’t of Commerce, 197 W.Va. 318 , 475 S.E.2d 410 (1996) (“A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error, and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.” (citation omitted)); Shamblin v. Nationwide Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Younggreen2 sentences2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bowmangreen2 sentences2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 1 | 1 |
McElhinny v. Minorgreen2 sentences2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 1 | 1 |
Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , 2011Co., 183 W.Va. 585, 599 , 396 S.E.2d 766, 780 (1990) (“[T]he appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.”); In re Tiffany Marie S., 196 W.Va. 223, 233 , 470 S.E.2d 177, 187 (1996) (“[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to error that was invited by the complaining party.”); Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co., 59 W.Va. 688, 689 , 53 S.E. 906, 907 (1906) (the party inviting “the error ... must accept its results”); Syllabus Point 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755 , 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”); Smith v. Bechtold, 190 W.Va. 315 , | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||