Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dobbins v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See also, Dobbins, ¶ 47, 298 P.3d at 820 (disregarding the district court’s variance from Rule 11 requirements because it did not affect Dobbins’ substantial rights). [¶18] Mr. Miller complains the district court violated his due process rights by failing to ascertain whether his guilty plea was voluntary under W.R.Cr.P. 11(d) or inquire on the record into the voluntariness or accuracy of his plea in accordance with W.R.Cr.P. 11(g). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. James Clayton Bellgreen1 sentence2019See also, Rule 11(h) (“Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”); United States v. Bell, 966 F.2d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1992) (under Fed. | 1 | 1 |
Kiet Hoang Nguyen v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis 2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis | 1 | 1 |
Kidwell v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis 2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis | 1 | 1 |
Duke v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis 2015Duke v. State, 2009 WY 74, ¶ 22 , 209 P.3d 563, 571 (Wyo.2009). " 'Plain error exists when: 1) the record is clear about the incident alleged as error; 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law; and 3) the party claiming the error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him."" Nguyen v. State, 2013 WY 50, ¶ 10 , 299 P.3d 683, 686 (Wyo.2013) (quoting Kidwell v. State, 2012 WY 91, ¶ 10 , 279 P.3d 540, 543 (Wyo.2012)); see also W.R.Cr.P. 11(h) ("Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be dis | 1 | 1 |
Pfeiffer v. City of La Mesagreen1 sentence2007The court said: "If every owner who disagrees with the conditions of a permit could unilaterally decide to comply with them under protest, do the work, and file an action in inverse condemnation on the theory of economic coercion, complete chaos would result in the administration of this important aspect of municipal affairs." Id. at 806. | 1 | 1 |
Ingalls v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Ingalls, ¶¶ 10, 22, 46 P.3d at 859, 863 . | 1 | 1 |
Dennis v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2001See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Juvenile Male (E. W. E.) v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2001See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Layne v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2001See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Bird v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Drake v. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue & Taxationgreen1 sentence1988Department of Revenue and Taxation, supra, at 1322. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Clark
green
1 sentence1966Such action by the court was disapproved in Jones v. Clark, Wyo., 418 P.2d 792 , and it is expected it will not reoccur. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.