test for harmless error (Wyoming) · Go Syfert
← Wyoming issues

test for harmless error in Wyoming

8 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Dysthe v. Stategreen
wyo · 2003 · cited in 6 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2005–2013
2 sentences

2013To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” Condra v. State, 2004 WY 131, ¶7 , 100 P.3d 386, 389 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Dysthe v. State, 2003 WY 20, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 875, 881 (Wyo.2003)). [¶ 9] The specific question that Leonard alleges as misconduct by the prosecutor was asked of Leonard’s adopted daughter (TN) as follows: “[TN], when these things would happen, did [Leonard] ever penetrate you with his fingers?” TN was called to testify by the State for

2013To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” Condra v. State, 2004 WY 131, ¶7 , 100 P.3d 386, 389 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Dysthe v. State, 2003 WY 20, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 875, 881 (Wyo.2003)). [¶ 9] The specific question that Leonard alleges as misconduct by the prosecutor was asked of Leonard’s adopted daughter (TN) as follows: “[TN], when these things would happen, did [Leonard] ever penetrate you with his fingers?” TN was called to testify by the State for

66
Condra v. Stategreen
wyo · 2004 · cited in 6 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2005–2013
2 sentences

2013To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” Condra v. State, 2004 WY 131, ¶7 , 100 P.3d 386, 389 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Dysthe v. State, 2003 WY 20, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 875, 881 (Wyo.2003)). [¶ 9] The specific question that Leonard alleges as misconduct by the prosecutor was asked of Leonard’s adopted daughter (TN) as follows: “[TN], when these things would happen, did [Leonard] ever penetrate you with his fingers?” TN was called to testify by the State for

2013To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” Condra v. State, 2004 WY 131, ¶7 , 100 P.3d 386, 389 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Dysthe v. State, 2003 WY 20, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 875, 881 (Wyo.2003)). [¶ 9] The specific question that Leonard alleges as misconduct by the prosecutor was asked of Leonard’s adopted daughter (TN) as follows: “[TN], when these things would happen, did [Leonard] ever penetrate you with his fingers?” TN was called to testify by the State for

66
Johnson v. Stategreen
wyo · 1990 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2003–2017
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2003To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends .the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo.2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo.2001), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

22
Skinner v. Stategreen
wyo · 2001 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2003–2017
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

22
Lancaster v. Stategreen
wyo · 2002 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2003–2017
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Earls v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2003To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends .the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo.2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo.2001), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

22003–2017
Dean v. Odom green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2003To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends .the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo.2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo.2001), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

22003–2017
Peoples-Hall v. Yukins, Warden green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2017To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo. 1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo. 2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

2003To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under “circumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice or conduct which offends .the public sense of fair play.” ’ Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990).” Lancaster v. State, 2002 WY 45, ¶ 28 , 43 P.3d 80, 93 (Wyo.2002) (quoting Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 767 (Wyo.2001), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002)).

22003–2017

Where else courts name it

WI 75 (1974–2026) FL 36 (1982–2026) TX 35 (1982–2019) ID 30 (1983–2021) KY 15 (1987–2024) MD 14 (1976–2017) IL 13 (1987–2025) LA 13 (1987–2022) PA 13 (2005–2023) GA 12 (1988–2025) WA 10 (1986–2020) CA 10 (1983–2026) UT 8 (1989–2021) WY 8 (2003–2017) IN 7 (1986–2015) DC 7 (1993–2020) MS 6 (2007–2014) NC 5 (1976–1989) NM 4 (2001–2009) OR 4 (1993–2017) IA 4 (1999–2024) AK 3 (1977–2009) NY 3 (1970–2009) OH 3 (2016–2019) WV 3 (2013–2017) VA 2 (2006–2014) NV 2 (1984–1984) CO 2 (1970–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check