Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stephan v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See id. at 1162 ; see also Suiter v. State, 785 P.2d 28, 31 (Alaska App.1989) (declining to apply Stephan rule to the booking process where evidence showed that failure to record the proceedings was inadverient rather than intentional). 6 . 774 P.2d 1326 (Alaska 1989). 7 . 629 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1980) rejected on other grounds in Stephan, 711 P.2d at 1163 . 8 . 2008See id. at 1162 ; see also Suiter v. State, 785 P.2d 28, 31 (Alaska App.1989) (declining to apply Stephan rule to the booking process where evidence showed that failure to record the proceedings was inadverient rather than intentional). 6 . 774 P.2d 1326 (Alaska 1989). 7 . 629 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1980) rejected on other grounds in Stephan, 711 P.2d at 1163 . 8 . | 1 | 3 |
Noey v. Bledsoegreen1 sentence2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Adoption of Erin G.green2 sentences2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of 2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 1 |
Griswold v. City of Homergreen1 sentence2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 1 |
Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rightsgreen1 sentence2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 1 |
Briggs v. City of Palmergreen1 sentence2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 1 |
Gilbert v. Nina Plaza Condo Ass'ngreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., Tobar v. Remington Holdings LP, 447 P.3d 747, 753 (Alaska 2019); Gilbert v. Nina Plaza Condo Ass’n, 64 P.3d 126, 129 (Alaska 2003). -9- 7453 The superior court denied Stephan’s motion, and Cecilia filed a motion for her attorney’s fees and costs.11 Stephan argued that Cecilia waived her right to pursue attorney’s fees when she filed her motion more than ten days after the court distributed its judgment.12 The court awarded Cecilia 20% of her actual attorney’s fees and costs. | 1 | 1 |
Tobar v. Remington Holdings LPgreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., Tobar v. Remington Holdings LP, 447 P.3d 747, 753 (Alaska 2019); Gilbert v. Nina Plaza Condo Ass’n, 64 P.3d 126, 129 (Alaska 2003). -9- 7453 The superior court denied Stephan’s motion, and Cecilia filed a motion for her attorney’s fees and costs.11 Stephan argued that Cecilia waived her right to pursue attorney’s fees when she filed her motion more than ten days after the court distributed its judgment.12 The court awarded Cecilia 20% of her actual attorney’s fees and costs. | 1 | 1 |
Suiter v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See id. at 1162 ; see also Suiter v. State, 785 P.2d 28, 31 (Alaska App.1989) (declining to apply Stephan rule to the booking process where evidence showed that failure to record the proceedings was inadverient rather than intentional). 6 . 774 P.2d 1326 (Alaska 1989). 7 . 629 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1980) rejected on other grounds in Stephan, 711 P.2d at 1163 . 8 . | 1 | 1 |
Thorne v. Department of Public Safetygreen1 sentence2008See id. at 1162 ; see also Suiter v. State, 785 P.2d 28, 31 (Alaska App.1989) (declining to apply Stephan rule to the booking process where evidence showed that failure to record the proceedings was inadverient rather than intentional). 6 . 774 P.2d 1326 (Alaska 1989). 7 . 629 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1980) rejected on other grounds in Stephan, 711 P.2d at 1163 . 8 . | 1 | 1 |
Putnam v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See id. at 1162 ; see also Suiter v. State, 785 P.2d 28, 31 (Alaska App.1989) (declining to apply Stephan rule to the booking process where evidence showed that failure to record the proceedings was inadverient rather than intentional). 6 . 774 P.2d 1326 (Alaska 1989). 7 . 629 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1980) rejected on other grounds in Stephan, 711 P.2d at 1163 . 8 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Isaacson Structural Steel Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.
green
1 sentence2021App. P. 521 (allowing appellate courts to “relax[] or “dispense[] with” the appellate rules “where a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice”); In re Adoption of Erin G., 140 P.3d 886, 889 (Alaska 2006) (“[T]he time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not jurisdictional and the rule may be relaxed or dispensed with ‘to avoid surprise or injustice.’ ” (quoting Isaacson Structural Steel Co., Div. of Isaacson Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 640 P.2d 812 , 815 n.8 (Alaska 1982)). 7 Conitz v. Alaska State Comm’n for Human Rights, 325 P.3d 501, 506 (Alaska 2014). 8 Briggs v. City of | 1 | 2021–2021 |
SB v. State
green
1 sentence1987Unrecorded statements made during non-custodial interrogations were not at issue in Mallott or its pre-Stephan progeny (see, e.g., McMahan v. State, 617 P.2d 494 (Alaska 1980); S.B. v. State, 614 P.2d 786 (Alaska 1980)). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
McMahan v. State
green
1 sentence1987Unrecorded statements made during non-custodial interrogations were not at issue in Mallott or its pre-Stephan progeny (see, e.g., McMahan v. State, 617 P.2d 494 (Alaska 1980); S.B. v. State, 614 P.2d 786 (Alaska 1980)). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Resecker v. State
green
2 sentences1987We note, however, that in Resecker v. State, 721 P.2d 650 (Alaska App.1986), we declined to extend the Stephan rule to custodial interrogations occurring at crime scene investigations, where recording equipment is available. 721 P.2d at 653 n. 1. 1987We note, however, that in Resecker v. State, 721 P.2d 650 (Alaska App.1986), we declined to extend the Stephan rule to custodial interrogations occurring at crime scene investigations, where recording equipment is available. 721 P.2d at 653 n. 1. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Farleigh v. Municipality of Anchorage
green
2 sentences1987Farleigh v. Anchorage, 728 P.2d 637 (Alaska 1986). 1987Farleigh v. Anchorage, 728 P.2d 637 (Alaska 1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.