Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roscoe v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1993We restated the Costa standard, but did not go on to apply it.... • “In Roscoe v. Jones, 571 So.2d 1043 (Ala.1990), another construction contract case, we reemphasized that Warren has a ‘narrow application.’ Id. at 1046 .” 607 So.2d at 134 . 1993We restated the Costa standard, but did not go on to apply it.... • “In Roscoe v. Jones, 571 So.2d 1043 (Ala.1990), another construction contract case, we reemphasized that Warren has a ‘narrow application.’ Id. at 1046 .” 607 So.2d at 134 . | 3 | 4 |
Ex Parte Jonesgreen2 sentences1993This Court recently put to rest the question of what standard should be used in evaluating whether the FAA applies to an agreement: "To resolve any inconsistency or confusion generated by the existence of two different standards, and determining, as we now do, that Warren presents a more reasoned approach than the Costa standard, we overrule any case inconsistent with Warren , to the extent that it states a different standard for determining the involvement of interstate commerce." Ex parte Jones , 628 So.2d 316 (Ala. 1993). 1993This Court recently put to rest the question of what standard should be used in evaluating whether the FAA applies to an agreement: "To resolve any inconsistency or confusion generated by the existence of two different standards, and determining, as we now do, that Warren presents a more reasoned approach than the Costa standard, we overrule any case inconsistent with Warren , to the extent that it states a different standard for determining the involvement of interstate commerce." Ex parte Jones , 628 So.2d 316 (Ala. 1993). | 1 | 3 |
Continental Grain Co., Inc. v. Beasleygreen2 sentences1993See also Continental Grain Co. v. Beasley , 628 So.2d 319 (Ala. 1993). 1993See also Continental Grain Co. v. Beasley , 628 So.2d 319 (Ala. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
HL FULLER CONST. v. Indus. Dev. Bd.
green
2 sentences1993Bd. of [the] Town of Vincent , 590 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1991), decided after Warren , we restated the Costa standard. 1993Bd. of [the] Town of Vincent , 590 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1991), decided after Warren , we restated the Costa standard. | 4 | 1992–1993 |
Ex Parte Brice Bldg. Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1993We restated the Costa standard, but did not go on to apply it.... • “In Roscoe v. Jones, 571 So.2d 1043 (Ala.1990), another construction contract case, we reemphasized that Warren has a ‘narrow application.’ Id. at 1046 .” 607 So.2d at 134 . 1993We restated the Costa standard, but did not go on to apply it.... • “In Roscoe v. Jones, 571 So.2d 1043 (Ala.1990), another construction contract case, we reemphasized that Warren has a ‘narrow application.’ Id. at 1046 .” 607 So.2d at 134 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Ex Parte Williams
green
2 sentences1993Indeed, Warren 's "contemplation" test has been applied in only two contexts — those involving automobile sales contracts between dealers and consumers, see Warren and Ex parte Williams , 555 So.2d 146 (Ala. 1989), and those, like this present case, involving stock purchase agreements. 1993Indeed, Warren 's "contemplation" test has been applied in only two contexts — those involving automobile sales contracts between dealers and consumers, see Warren and Ex parte Williams , 555 So.2d 146 (Ala. 1989), and those, like this present case, involving stock purchase agreements. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Lopez v. Home Buyers Warranty Corp.
green
2 sentences2000(Some citations omitted.) In Lopez v. Home Buyers Warranty Corp., 628 So.2d 361 (Ala.1993), this Court also applied the "more reasoned approach" of Warren. 628 So.2d at 363. 2000(Some citations omitted.) In Lopez v. Home Buyers Warranty Corp., 628 So.2d 361 (Ala.1993), this Court also applied the "more reasoned approach" of Warren. 628 So.2d at 363. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.