Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1983–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Elmore v. Stategreen2 sentences1992"A repetitious inquiry [into] probable cause after indictment is not necessary." Elmore v. State , 445 So.2d 943 , 945 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983). 1991Elmore v. State, 445 So.2d 943, 945 (Ala. Cr.App.1983). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duncan v. State
green
2 sentences1985As pointed out by the court in Duncan v. State, 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Crim.App.1979) “No reversible error occurs where an indictment has been returned against the accused ... since the court is not required to hold a repetitious inquiry into probable cause.” Similarly, this court upheld the denial of a preliminary hearing in Bradford v. State, 387 So.2d 906 (Ala.Crim.App.1980), cert, denied, 387 So.2d 913 (Ala.1980). 1985Scaife v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); Ex parte Campbell , 278 Ala. 114 , 176 So.2d 242 (1965); Duncan v. *Page 699 State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Potts , 426 So.2d 896 (Ala. 1983). | 4 | 1983–1985 |
Scaife v. State
neutral
2 sentences1985Elmore v. State , supra; Caifa v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Crim.App. 1976); Duncan v. State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979). 1985Scaife v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); Ex parte Campbell , 278 Ala. 114 , 176 So.2d 242 (1965); Duncan v. *Page 699 State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Potts , 426 So.2d 896 (Ala. 1983). | 3 | 1983–1985 |
Ex Parte Potts
green
2 sentences1985Likewise, in Potts v. State, 426 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), affirmed 426 So.2d 896 (Ala.1983), it was determined that there is no constitutional requirement that there be two inquiries into probable cause. 1985Scaife v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); Ex parte Campbell , 278 Ala. 114 , 176 So.2d 242 (1965); Duncan v. *Page 699 State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Potts , 426 So.2d 896 (Ala. 1983). | 3 | 1983–1985 |
Ex Parte Campbell
neutral
2 sentences1985Scaife v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); Ex parte Campbell , 278 Ala. 114 , 176 So.2d 242 (1965); Duncan v. *Page 699 State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Potts , 426 So.2d 896 (Ala. 1983). 1985Scaife v. State , 337 So.2d 146 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976); Ex parte Campbell , 278 Ala. 114 , 176 So.2d 242 (1965); Duncan v. *Page 699 State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Potts , 426 So.2d 896 (Ala. 1983). | 2 | 1983–1985 |
Potts v. State
green
2 sentences1985Likewise, in Potts v. State, 426 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), affirmed 426 So.2d 896 (Ala.1983), it was determined that there is no constitutional requirement that there be two inquiries into probable cause. 1985Potts v. State, 426 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim. | 2 | 1985–1985 |
Bradford v. State
neutral
1 sentence1985As pointed out by the court in Duncan v. State, 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Crim.App.1979) “No reversible error occurs where an indictment has been returned against the accused ... since the court is not required to hold a repetitious inquiry into probable cause.” Similarly, this court upheld the denial of a preliminary hearing in Bradford v. State, 387 So.2d 906 (Ala.Crim.App.1980), cert, denied, 387 So.2d 913 (Ala.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Sly v. State
green
1 sentence1985As pointed out by the court in Duncan v. State, 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Crim.App.1979) “No reversible error occurs where an indictment has been returned against the accused ... since the court is not required to hold a repetitious inquiry into probable cause.” Similarly, this court upheld the denial of a preliminary hearing in Bradford v. State, 387 So.2d 906 (Ala.Crim.App.1980), cert, denied, 387 So.2d 913 (Ala.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.