Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. Rental Management, Inc.green2 sentences2018Hall v. Rental Management, Inc. , 323 Ark. 143 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996). 2018Hall v. Rental Management, Inc. , 323 Ark. 143 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996). | 1 | 4 |
Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIXgreen2 sentences1996See Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989) and Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969) where we said that there was no evidence of “an agreement or assumption of duty that removes the landlord from the general rule.” (Emphasis added.) Indeed, this principle is widely recognized. 1996See Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989) and Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969) where we said that there was no evidence of “an agreement or assumption of duty that removes the landlord from the general rule.” (Emphasis added.) Indeed, this principle is widely recognized. | 1 | 2 |
Kilbury v. McConnellgreen2 sentences1996See Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989) and Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969) where we said that there was no evidence of “an agreement or assumption of duty that removes the landlord from the general rule.” (Emphasis added.) Indeed, this principle is widely recognized. 1996See Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989) and Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969) where we said that there was no evidence of “an agreement or assumption of duty that removes the landlord from the general rule.” (Emphasis added.) Indeed, this principle is widely recognized. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bartley v. Sweetser
green
2 sentences2008Id.; accord Hall v. Rental Mgmt., Inc., 323 Ark. 143 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994). 2008Id.; accord Hall v. Rental Mgmt., Inc., 323 Ark. 143 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994). | 3 | 1996–2008 |
Propst v. McNeill
green
2 sentences1997Moreover, in Propst v. McNeill, 326 Ark. 623 , 932 S.W.2d 766 (1996), the court stated that no Arkansas law had been shown where a landlord’s retention-of-control exception had ever been recognized, thus, the Propst court held that only an express agreement or assumption of duty by conduct can remove a landlord from the general rule of nonliability. 1997Moreover, in Propst v. McNeill, 326 Ark. 623 , 932 S.W.2d 766 (1996), the court stated that no Arkansas law had been shown where a landlord’s retention-of-control exception had ever been recognized, thus, the Propst court held that only an express agreement or assumption of duty by conduct can remove a landlord from the general rule of nonliability. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
BARNES, QUINN, FLAKE, AND ANDERSON, INC. v. Rankins
green
2 sentences1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). 1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cherepski v. Walker
green
1 sentence1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hurst v. Feild
green
2 sentences1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). 1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Joseph v. Riffel
neutral
2 sentences1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). 1996Hall v. Rental Management, Inc., 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 293 (1996); Bartley v. Sweetser, 319 Ark. 117 , 890 S.W.2d 250 (1994); Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson v. Rankins, 312 Ark. 240 , 848 S.W.2d 924 (1993); Glasgow v. Century Property Fund XIX, 299 Ark. 221 , 772 S.W.2d 312 (1989); Hurst v. Feild, 281 Ark. 106 , 661 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969); Joseph v. Riffke, 186 Ark. 418 , 53 S.W.2d 987 (1932). | 1 | 1996–1996 |