Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grandjean v. Grandjeangreen2 sentences2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). 2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
neutral
2 sentences2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). 2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). | 3 | 1987–2016 |
Headrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). 2016See Grandjean v. Grandjean, 315 Ark. 620 , 869 S.W.2d 709 (1994); Headrick, 293 Ark. 433 , 738 S.W.2d 418 ; Moon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971). | 3 | 1994–2016 |
Trammell v. Wright
green
1 sentence2026“False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another consisting of detention without sufficient legal authority.” Trammell v. 11 Wright, 2016 Ark. 147, at 4, 489 S.W.3d 636, 638 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Faulkinbury v. United States Fire Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1987Moon v. The Sperry and Hutchinson Company, 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971); Faulkinbury v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company, 247 Ark. 70 , 444 S.W.2d 254 (1969). 1987Moon v. The Sperry and Hutchinson Company, 250 Ark. 453 , 465 S.W.2d 330 (1971); Faulkinbury v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company, 247 Ark. 70 , 444 S.W.2d 254 (1969). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Watkins v. Oaklawn Jockey Club
green
1 sentence1973Stat. Ann. § 41-1601 (Repl. 1964) defines false imprisonment as “the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another, and consists in confinement or detention without sufficient legal authority.” In Watkins v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, 86 F. Supp. 1006 , decided by the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Hot Springs Division, Judge John E. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
McIntosh v. Bullard, Earnheart & Magness
neutral
2 sentences1971The principle of law announced by this court in McIntosh v. Bullard, Earnheart & Magness, 95 Ark. 227 , 129 S. W. 85 (1910) is: “Where a person does no more than to give information by affidavit to an officer relative to a matter over which he has jurisdiction, such person is not liable for a trespass for false imprisonment for the acts done under a warrant which the officer issues on said charge.” The above mentioned rule was made in conjunction with an action for illegal arrest and false imprisonment, a fortiori, we think it controls in the case at bar. 1971The principle of law announced by this court in McIntosh v. Bullard, Earnheart & Magness, 95 Ark. 227 , 129 S. W. 85 (1910) is: “Where a person does no more than to give information by affidavit to an officer relative to a matter over which he has jurisdiction, such person is not liable for a trespass for false imprisonment for the acts done under a warrant which the officer issues on said charge.” The above mentioned rule was made in conjunction with an action for illegal arrest and false imprisonment, a fortiori, we think it controls in the case at bar. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.