judge commits error (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

judge commits error in Arizona

7 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Burkegreen
ariz · 2003 · cited in 4 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2007–2016
2 sentences

2016Co. v. Burke, 204 Ariz. 251, 254, ¶ 10 (2003) (quotations and citations omitted).

2009Co. v. Burke, 204 Ariz. 251, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 282, 285 (2003) (additional citations omitted) (first two alterations in Sanders).

44
Francis v. Sandersgreen
arizctapp · 2009 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Francis v. Sanders, 222 Ariz. 423, ¶ 10 , 215 P.3d 397, 400 (App.2009). “‘But when a judge commits an error of law ... in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion, [she] may be regarded as having abused [her] discretion.’ ” Id., quoting Twin City Fire Ins.

2009Francis v. Sanders, 222 Ariz. 423, ¶ 10 , 215 P.3d 397, 400 (App.2009). “‘But when a judge commits an error of law ... in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion, [she] may be regarded as having abused [her] discretion.’ ” Id., quoting Twin City Fire Ins.

22
Perguson v. Tamisgreen
arizctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007Co. v. Burke, 204 Ariz. 251, 254, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 282, 285 (2003) (internal citations omitted); see also Perguson v. Tamis, 188 Ariz. 425, 427 , 937 P.2d 347, 349 (App.1996). ¶ 7 Appellants assert that the trial court erred in appointing the receiver because Hills did not establish the legal requirements for the appointment of a receiver and the appointment deprives Gravel of its constitutional right to a trial by jury.

2007Co. v. Burke, 204 Ariz. 251, 254, ¶ 10 , 63 P.3d 282, 285 (2003) (internal citations omitted); see also Perguson v. Tamis, 188 Ariz. 425, 427 , 937 P.2d 347, 349 (App.1996). ¶ 7 Appellants assert that the trial court erred in appointing the receiver because Hills did not establish the legal requirements for the appointment of a receiver and the appointment deprives Gravel of its constitutional right to a trial by jury.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Campoy green
arizctapp · 2009
2 sentences

2010Second, when, as here, a trial judge commits an error of law, the judge abuses her discretion, see Campoy, 220 Ariz. 539, ¶ 37 , 207 P.3d at 804 , one of the bases for granting special action relief, see Ariz. R.

2010Second, when, as here, a trial judge commits an error of law, the judge abuses her discretion, see Campoy, 220 Ariz. 539, ¶ 37 , 207 P.3d at 804 , one of the bases for granting special action relief, see Ariz. R.

22010–2010
State v. Burnetts green
ariz · 1956
2 sentences

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

11979–1979
State v. Corrales green
arizctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

11979–1979
State v. Werring green
ariz · 1974
2 sentences

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

11979–1979
State v. Lamb green
ariz · 1977
2 sentences

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

11979–1979
State v. Robin green
ariz · 1975
2 sentences

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

1979State v. Lamb, 116 Ariz. 134 , 568 P.2d 1032 (1977); State v. Robin, 112 Ariz. 467 , 543 P.2d 779 (1975); State v. Werring, 111 Ariz. 68 , 523 P.2d 499 (1974); State v. Burnetts, 80 Ariz. 208 , 295 P.2d 377 (1956); State v. Corrales, 121 Ariz. 104 , 588 P.2d 846 (App. 1978).

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

AZ 7 (1979–2016) SC 5 (1985–2011) LA 4 (1904–1986) VA 4 (2003–2009) GA 3 (1901–1981) IL 3 (1981–2012) NC 3 (1980–1985) WA 2 (2010–2010) MI 2 (2017–2018) TX 2 (1996–2009) AR 2 (1997–2010) TN 2 (2002–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check