offense is not fundamental error (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

offense is not fundamental error in Arizona

7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Avilagreen
ariz · 1985 · cited in 3 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1989–1995
2 sentences

1995Rather, the court relied on Arizona’s rule that the “failure to instruct on a necessary element of an offense is not fundamental error where there is no issue as to that element.” 175 Ariz. at 600 , 858 P.2d at 1193 (quoting Avila, 147 Ariz. at 338 , 710 P.2d at 448 ).

1995Rather, the court relied on Arizona’s rule that the “failure to instruct on a necessary element of an offense is not fundamental error where there is no issue as to that element.” 175 Ariz. at 600 , 858 P.2d at 1193 (quoting Avila, 147 Ariz. at 338 , 710 P.2d at 448 ).

13
State v. Fullemgreen
arizctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024State v. Fullem, 185 Ariz. 134, 138 (App. 1995) (“Arizona has traditionally followed the rule that the failure to instruct the jury on an essential element of an offense is not fundamental error where there is no issue as to that element.”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Agnew green
arizctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985State v. Agnew, 132 Ariz. 567 , 647 P.2d 1165 (App.1982).

1985State v. Agnew, 132 Ariz. 567 , 647 P.2d 1165 (App.1982).

21984–1985
State v. Bible green
ariz · 1993
2 sentences

1995Rather, the court relied on Arizona’s rule that the “failure to instruct on a necessary element of an offense is not fundamental error where there is no issue as to that element.” 175 Ariz. at 600 , 858 P.2d at 1193 (quoting Avila, 147 Ariz. at 338 , 710 P.2d at 448 ).

1995Rather, the court relied on Arizona’s rule that the “failure to instruct on a necessary element of an offense is not fundamental error where there is no issue as to that element.” 175 Ariz. at 600 , 858 P.2d at 1193 (quoting Avila, 147 Ariz. at 338 , 710 P.2d at 448 ).

11995–1995
State v. Styers green
ariz · 1993
2 sentences

1995Later, in State v. Styers, 177 Ariz. 104 , 865 P.2d 765 (1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 159 , 130 L.Ed.2d 97 (1994), the issue came before the Arizona Supreme Court again.

1995Later, in State v. Styers, 177 Ariz. 104 , 865 P.2d 765 (1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 159 , 130 L.Ed.2d 97 (1994), the issue came before the Arizona Supreme Court again.

11995–1995
Andrisani v. Saugus Colony Ltd. green
scotus · 1994
1 sentence

1995Later, in State v. Styers, 177 Ariz. 104 , 865 P.2d 765 (1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 159 , 130 L.Ed.2d 97 (1994), the issue came before the Arizona Supreme Court again.

11995–1995
State v. Evans green
ariz · 1973
2 sentences

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

11982–1982
State v. Reim green
arizctapp · 1976
2 sentences

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

11982–1982
State v. Finley green
ariz · 1972
2 sentences

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

11982–1982
State v. Galbraith green
arizctapp · 1976
2 sentences

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

1982State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491 , 512 P.2d 1225 (1973) (failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); State v. Finley, 108 Ariz. 420 , 501 P.2d 4 (1972); *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App. 528 , 549 P.2d 1046 (1976); State v. Galbraith, 114 Ariz. 174 , 559 P.2d 1089 (App.1976).

11982–1982

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4031 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AZ 7 (1982–2024) IN 3 (1982–2013) FL 2 (2006–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check