Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1960–1978 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. State of Arizonagreen2 sentences1964See also Riley v. State, 50 Ariz. 442 , 73 P.2d 96 . 1964See also Riley v. State, 50 Ariz. 442 , 73 P.2d 96 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vidalez
neutral
2 sentences1978United States v. White, 377 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1967); State v. Vidalez, 89 Ariz. 215 , 360 P.2d 224 (1961) nor will he be permitted to take advantage of an error which was a natural consequence of his own actions. 1978United States v. White, 377 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1967); State v. Vidalez, 89 Ariz. 215 , 360 P.2d 224 (1961) nor will he be permitted to take advantage of an error which was a natural consequence of his own actions. | 3 | 1962–1978 |
Hightower v. State of Arizona
green
2 sentences1965State v. Vidalez, 89 Ariz. 215 , 360 P.2d 224 (1961); Hightower v. State, 62 Ariz. 351 , 158 P.2d. 156 (1945). 1965State v. Vidalez, 89 Ariz. 215 , 360 P.2d 224 (1961); Hightower v. State, 62 Ariz. 351 , 158 P.2d. 156 (1945). | 3 | 1960–1965 |
State v. Paramo
green
2 sentences1965State v. Gortarez, 96 Ariz. 206 , 393 P.2d 670 (1964) ; State v. Paramo, 92 Ariz. 290 , 376 P.2d 554 (1962). 1964“A party may not invite error at the trial and then assign it as error on appeal.” State v. Paramo, 92 Ariz. 290, 294 , 376 P.2d 5S4, 556. | 2 | 1964–1965 |
United States v. Edwin Walker White
green
1 sentence1978United States v. White, 377 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1967); State v. Vidalez, 89 Ariz. 215 , 360 P.2d 224 (1961) nor will he be permitted to take advantage of an error which was a natural consequence of his own actions. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Gortarez
green
2 sentences1965State v. Gortarez, 96 Ariz. 206 , 393 P.2d 670 (1964) ; State v. Paramo, 92 Ariz. 290 , 376 P.2d 554 (1962). 1965State v. Gortarez, 96 Ariz. 206 , 393 P.2d 670 (1964) ; State v. Paramo, 92 Ariz. 290 , 376 P.2d 554 (1962). | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.