Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Logangreen2 sentences2024See State v. Logan, 200 Ariz. 564 , 565 ¶ 8 (2001) (“[W]hen a party requests an erroneous instruction, any resulting error is invited and the party waives his right to challenge the instruction on appeal.”); see also Krone, 182 Ariz. at 323 (“A defendant should not have a lesser included instruction forced upon him.”). 2016See State v. Logan, 200 Ariz. 564 , 565 ¶ 8, 30 P.3d 631, 632 (2001) (“[W]hen a party requests an erroneous instruction, any resulting error is invited and the party waives his right to challenge the instruction on appeal.”). | 6 | 6 |
State v. Kronegreen1 sentence2024See State v. Logan, 200 Ariz. 564 , 565 ¶ 8 (2001) (“[W]hen a party requests an erroneous instruction, any resulting error is invited and the party waives his right to challenge the instruction on appeal.”); see also Krone, 182 Ariz. at 323 (“A defendant should not have a lesser included instruction forced upon him.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Shattuckgreen2 sentences2014State v. Shattuck, 140 Ariz. 582, 584-85 , 684 P.2d 154, 156-57 (1984). 2014State v. Shattuck, 140 Ariz. 582, 584-85 , 684 P.2d 154, 156-57 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sisson v. State
green
2 sentences2001In Sisson v. State, 16 Ariz. 170 , 141 P. 713 (1914), we considered an erroneous instruction that placed a burden of proof upon the defendant. 2001In Sisson v. State, 16 Ariz. 170 , 141 P. 713 (1914), we considered an erroneous instruction that placed a burden of proof upon the defendant. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.