7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of Henriettagreen1 sentence2022A § 1985 (3) conspir- acy must also be motivated by some racial or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidious discriminatory animus behind the conspirators’ action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cine SK8, Inc. v. Henrietta, 507 F.3d 778, 791 (2d Cir. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Miguel Nunez (88-2089) and Ernesto Rodriguez (88-2090)green1 sentence2012See, e.g., United States v. Nunez, 889 F.2d 1564, 1568 (6th Cir. 1989) (The Court of Appeals concluded that it was improper for the trial court to reiterate the entire conspiracy instruction when the jury sought a clarification as to the specific issue of whether a law enforcement officer could be a coconspirator: “When a jury seeks clarification of particular issues . . . the judge should clear away its difficulties with concrete accuracy. . . . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Palangiogreen2 sentences2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , 2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , | 1 | 1 |
State v. Moralesgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , 2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , | 1 | 1 |
McFarland v. Department of Developmental Servicesgreen1 sentence2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bryant
green
1 sentence2012When a jury indicates confusion about an important legal issue, it is not sufficient for the court to rely on more general statements in its prior charge.” [Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); State v. Bryant, 5 Kan. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Morales
green
2 sentences2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , 2011See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 , | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Marshak v. Marshak
green
1 sentence1997Marshak v. Marshak, 226 Conn. 652 , 668 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Pitt River Tribe of Indians v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
green
1 sentence1997Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 7981 (1976), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a conspiracy claim based upon the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Metro Bolt & Fastener Corp. v. Coats
green
1 sentence1997Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 7981 (1976), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a conspiracy claim based upon the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Williams v. Maislen
green
1 sentence1993"The requisites of a civil action for conspiracy are: (1) a combination between two or more persons, (2) to do . . . an unlawful act . . ., (3) an act done by one or more of the conspirators . . ., (4) which act results in damage to the plaintiff." (Citations omitted.) Williams v. Maislen, 116 Conn. 433 , 437 , 165 A. 211 (1933). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining Committee
green
1 sentence1993"The requisites of a civil action for conspiracy are: (1) a combination between two or more persons, (2) to do . . . an unlawful act . . ., (3) an act done by one or more of the conspirators . . ., (4) which act results in damage to the plaintiff." (Citations omitted.) Williams v. Maislen, 116 Conn. 433 , 437 , 165 A. 211 (1933). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins
green
1 sentence1974A recent ease in which the inculpatory portion of a confession by a codefendant was excised by the trial judge in order to comply with Bruton is United States v. Jenkins, 496 F.2d 57 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.